Category: Uncategorized

  • What Singapore’s Latest Teacher Survey Means For Parents Of Secondary Schoolers

    TL;DR: Singapore teachers work some of the longest hours globally and report higher stress than the OECD average. Much of the strain comes from admin and marking—yet teachers are also among the world’s most active users of AI in class. Here’s what that means for your teen, and how you can help.

    Key takeaways at a glance

    • Work hours & stress: Full-time teachers here average 47.3 hours/week (OECD avg: 41). 27% report “a lot” of stress (OECD avg: 19%), up 4 percentage points since 2018. Younger teachers (<30) feel it more. CNA
    • Where time goes: Teachers spend 4 hours/week on admin (OECD avg: 3), 6.4 hours on marking (OECD avg: 4.6). They teach 17.7 hours and prepare 8.2 hours weekly (OECD avgs: 22.7 teaching; 7.4 prep). CNA
    • Top stressors: (1) Too much administrative work, (2) too much marking, (3) being held responsible for student achievement. CNA
    • Resignations remain low: Average annual resignation rate stays around 2–3%—lower than other civil service schemes. CNA
    • High digital & AI adoption: 75% of teachers use AI for teaching (OECD avg: 36%); most say AI helps with lesson planning (82%) and admin automation (74%). 81% worked in schools doing online/hybrid lessons in the month before the survey (OECD avg: 16%). CNA+1

    Why this matters for your child

    1. Teacher bandwidth impacts feedback speed. With notable time on admin and marking, feedback cycles can stretch—especially around exam seasons. Expect occasional delays in returned scripts or parent replies. CNA
    2. Lesson prep is intensive. Teachers are investing more time crafting and curating lessons. That often translates to richer in-class activities and better-aligned resources for your teen. CNA
    3. Wellbeing links to classroom climate. Higher stress doesn’t mean lower care—it means capacity is tight. A supportive school-home partnership helps teachers stay focused on student learning. CNA

    What to do as a parent (practical tips)

    • Use official channels—and respect boundaries. MOE emphasises baseline expectations for communication; teachers aren’t expected to respond outside school hours except for emergencies. If something’s urgent, state that clearly; otherwise, give 1–2 working days. CNA
    • Make your emails “easy to answer.” One topic per message, a clear question, bullet-pointed context, and any required documents attached. This reduces back-and-forth in already packed schedules. (This aligns with the survey’s finding that admin load is a key stressor.) CNA
    • Leverage school platforms. Submit forms and MCs promptly via Parents Gateway or school systems to cut admin. MOE has piloted tech to streamline processes—use them. CNA
    • Prioritise parent-teacher time. Save complex discussions for scheduled meetings (e.g., PTM or a set appointment) so teachers can prepare data on your teen’s progress.

    The AI angle: what it means for learning at home

    • Expect AI-assisted lesson design. Many teachers use AI to refine lesson plans and generate materials. If your teen mentions AI-driven quizzes, exemplars, or feedback, that’s increasingly normal. CNA+1
    • Homework may shift. With AI easing administrative tasks, teachers can assign more targeted practice and higher-order tasks (explanations, reflections, real-world applications). Support your teen to go beyond “right answers” to “clear reasoning.” CNA
    • Model responsible AI use at home. Encourage your teen to use school-approved tools for brainstorming and draft feedback—while citing sources and avoiding plagiarism. Teachers are familiar with AI in the workflow; responsible habits matter. CNA

    What the system is doing

    MOE says it is streamlining non-teaching duties (e.g., exam admin cut by ~10%), setting communication baselines, and investing in automated marking and AI assessment tools to ease marking loads—aimed at returning more teacher time to teaching. CNA

    Bottom line

    Your child’s teachers are working long hours under high expectations, but they’re also early adopters of effective digital and AI tools. Clear, respectful communication and smart use of school systems can lighten the admin burden—freeing teachers to focus on what helps your teen most: thoughtful instruction, timely feedback, and wellbeingCNA+2CNA+2

    Source: CNA coverage of the 2024 OECD Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS), published Oct 7, 2025.CNA

  • Bold New Art Syllabus: Future-Ready, AI-Smart

    If your teen is in secondary school, you’ll soon notice Art lessons feel different in a good way. Singapore’s refreshed Art syllabus puts ideas and thinking at the centre, with strong support for communication, reflection, and ethical use of technology (including AI). Here’s what that means for your child and how you can support them at home.


    What’s actually changing?

    1) Ideas over “perfect products”

    Students still learn skills (drawing, painting, photography, digital tools), but the real emphasis is on how they generate, test, and communicate ideas. Sketchbooks, mood boards, mind maps, and critique conversations now carry more weight because they show how thinking evolves.

    2) Real-world relevance (and local flavour)

    Lessons lean on pop culture your teen already knows, local artists, and everyday issues (e.g., ageing, environment, public spaces). The aim: help students see Art as a visual language that can influence perceptions and create positive change here in Singapore.

    3) AI as a tool, not the driver

    Older students may design with AI (e.g., image generation, layout suggestions) and—crucially—learn to question it. Expect guided discussions about authorship, bias, originality, and ethics. Tech should serve a student’s idea, not replace it.

    4) Clearer progression

    Lower Sec builds broad confidence and visual literacy; Upper Sec deepens concept, research, iteration, and critique. Where relevant, subject levels (G1/G2/G3/Higher Art) align expectations while keeping the core philosophy consistent: process + communication + craft.

    What a week in Art might look like now

    • Concept brief: “Design a ‘helper’ object/creature to improve community life in your HDB estate.”
    • Research: Students collect references from local spaces, interview family/peers, and study relevant artists or designs.
    • Iteration: Multiple sketches or mockups—including one AI-assisted trial—with notes on what changed and why.
    • Critique: Peers give feedback on the idea (not just neatness), and students document how they’ll improve.
    • Reflection: Short write-up: What problem are you solving? Which choices communicate your intent? How did tech help—or hinder—your vision?

    How assessment is evolving (what counts)

    Traditional craft still matters—but marks are increasingly balanced across:

    1. Idea + Intent
      Can your child clearly explain the problem, message, or theme?
    2. Process Evidence
      Research depth, trials/iterations, risk-taking, and how they respond to feedback.
    3. Communication & Reflection
      Artist statements, captions, page layouts, and critique notes.
    4. Craft & Finish
      Technique, control of media, presentation quality.
    5. Ethical Tech Use (when applicable)
      Original prompts, proper attribution, clear separation between AI outputs and student-made elements, and thoughtful reflection on limitations.
  • From Tuition to AI Tutors in Singapore: What Parents Need to Know

    Published context: CNA reports that AI-powered “tutors” are becoming popular, pitching lower cost and convenience versus traditional tuition—yet experts and MOE flag important caveats. (Article date: 26 Sep 2025.) (CNA)

    What exactly is an “AI tutor”?

    Think chat-style study assistants and practice platforms that explain concepts, generate questions, and mark answers—often tailored to Singapore syllabuses. Examples in the CNA piece include platforms like Tutorly, WizzTutor, and a Telegram bot, “The Wise Otter.” (CNA)

    Why parents are interested

    • On-demand help at home: Students ask questions the moment they’re stuck, without waiting for the next lesson. One parent interviewed called it “a gamechanger” compared with ferrying kids to physical centres. (CNA)
    • Lower, transparent pricing: CNA cites a typical range of S$20–S$120/hour for 1-to-1 tuition and up to S$172 per secondary lesson (≈ S$688/month) at name-brand centres, versus app subscriptions (e.g., Tutorly ~S$49/month)—a big gap for families. (CNA)
    • Rising tuition spend: Households spent S$1.8b in 2023 on private tuition (up from S$1.4b in 2018), so cheaper options naturally get attention. (CNA)

    MOE’s position (and what it means for you)

    • Registration: MOE told CNA that AI learning tools for self-directed use do not need to register under the Education Act. (Under the Act, centres offering tuition/enrichment to ≥10 students must register.) In short: using an AI study app at home isn’t the same as enrolling in a registered tuition centre. (CNA)
    • Use responsibly: MOE encourages parents and students to exercise discretion and use such tools safely and responsibly. (CNA)

    The big caveat: “shortcut thinking”

    Lecturers and educators interviewed warn that some bots will hand over answers when nudged (“I don’t know”)—great for speed, not for learning. The healthiest use is to treat AI as a thinking partner, not an answer vending machine. (CNA)

    Will AI replace human tutors?

    Unlikely, say experts. Expect hybrid models: AI for practice/explanations, humans to motivate, coach, and set context. Even AI-forward firms told CNA they’re expanding both in-person and online support. (CNA)


    A parent’s checklist: choosing and using AI tutors well

    1) Match to your child’s syllabus and needs
    Look for platforms that explicitly cover your child’s level/subjects (e.g., Sec 1 Math vs JC Chem) and provide explanations, worked steps, and practice—not just final answers. (CNA)

    2) Probe the pedagogy
    Before paying, test whether the bot asks guiding questions, shows worked solutions, and lets your child explain their reasoning back (not just “here’s the answer”). CNA’s trial found some bots give answers too readily; favor those that scaffold thinking. (CNA)

    3) Compare true costs
    Stack subscriptions (e.g., ~S$49/month cited for Tutorly) against your current tuition spend (CNA notes up to S$172 per secondary lesson at brand-name centres). Hybrid pairing—fewer tuition hours + AI practice—can stretch budgets without losing human support. (CNA)

    4) Keep a human in the loop
    Build a weekly rhythm: your child studies with AI, then debriefs with a parent/tutor/teacher on misconceptions and habits. Experts interviewed emphasize that motivation and accountability still need humans. (CNA)

    5) Safety & data hygiene
    Follow MOE’s nudge to use tools “safely and responsibly.” Encourage your child not to paste personal data, set device-time limits, and review chat histories together for quality and appropriateness. (CNA)

    6) Watch for real learning signals
    Prefer platforms that let you see:

    • Error patterns (what topics trip them up),
    • Progress over time, and
    • Reflection prompts (“What did I learn?” not only “Was I right?”). Educators in the article stress normalising that reflection. (CNA)

    When an AI tutor makes sense—and when it doesn’t

    Good fit:

    • Your child is self-motivated and needs quick clarifications outside lesson hours.
    • Budget is tight and you want more practice volume between human-led sessions. (CNA)

    Not enough on its own:

    • Your child avoids effort and hunts for shortcuts;
    • They need structured coachingexam strategy, or emotional support (confidence, mindset), which experts say technology still struggles to replace. (CNA)

    Bottom line for Singapore parents

    AI tutors are a useful amplifier—not a silver bullet. Used well, they can reduce costs, boost practice, and free up your human tutor or teacher to focus on higher-order coaching. But to protect true learning (and attention spans), keep humans in the loop, insist on worked reasoning, and follow MOE’s advice to use these tools wisely and safely. (CNA)

    Source: CNA’s “AI tutors are on the rise. Could they disrupt Singapore’s billion-dollar tuition industry?” (26 Sep 2025). (CNA)

  • Desmond Lee on Stronger Anti-Bullying Measures in Schools

    MOE’s stance & principles

    • Zero tolerance for hurtful behaviour/bullying (incl. cyber).
    • Whole-community prevention: home, school, peers, online.
    • Discipline is educative: consequences + rehabilitation + restoring relationships.
    • Parents are key partners; schools also work with community agencies.

    What’s already in place

    • Policies & rules against bullying; regular discipline talks.
    • Multiple reporting channels: directly to teachers/school leaders, via peer support leaders, email/online forms.
    • Investigation → proportional measures: from reflection (for callous remarks) to detention/suspensioncaning for boys in egregious cases; police report for severe cases.
    • Immediate safety plans for victims: separation from perpetrators, takedown of hurtful online content, buddying by peers.
    • Psycho-social support: teachers & counsellors; REACH / community referrals if distress persists.
    • Teacher prep/training: recognising distress, managing hurtful behaviour; schools share practices via Community Learning Networks.

    2020–2021 enhancements (already implemented)

    1. CCE refresh: stronger emphasis on kindness/respect online & offline.
    2. Peer Support System in every school (students trained as upstanders).
    3. Designated staff for school culture/anti-bullying/parent & community partnership.

    Current review & consultations (2025 → 2026)

    • Comprehensive review underway since early 2025; ongoing public consultations.
    • Four workstreams:
      1. School culture, environment, processes
      2. Values education (greater emphasis)
      3. Resources & capacity for schools/educators
      4. School–home partnerships
    • Target: release recommendations in 1H 2026.

    Notable MP suggestions & Minister’s replies (highlights)

    • In-school vs home suspension: Schools already use both; in-school can be more effective when unsupervised home time blunts consequences.
    • Anti-retaliation clause & baseline reporting options: Will study as part of review.
    • Monitoring post-incident: Schools monitor victims’ safety plans and perpetrators’ interventions; customise with counsellors/REACH as needed.
    • Parent engagement: Timing depends on severity/repeat behaviour; priority is immediate safety, then facts, then notify all relevant parents and co-work on follow-ups.
    • Intersecting child maltreatment: Schools coordinate with FSCs/specialist agencies when family violence/maltreatment is flagged.
    • Consistency & accountability across schools: MOE framework + learning networks guide practice; early identification embedded through CCE, staff training, and peer systems.
    • Cyberbullying takedowns: IMDA has powers (threshold-based) to require platform removals; schools also compel student removals as part of resolution.
    • Centralised anti-bullying support unit: Under consideration to reduce burden on teachers and handle egregious cases.
    • Over-reporting vs resilience: Teachers exercise judgment; aim is safety + resilience, not over-protection.
    • School/staff penalties or cover-ups: Minister not aware of penalties tied to incidents; specific “cover-up” claims would be investigated.
    • Measuring impact & parental toolkit uptake: Behaviour change is multi-factor; hard to quantify neatly; toolkit accessibility to be improved (data on uptake not provided).
  • How MOE Will Tackle Bullying in Singapore Schools (2025 Update)

    MOE is running a Comprehensive Action Review against Bullying (CAR) started in early 2025 to tighten structures and processes, with stakeholder engagement now underway and recommendations due in 1H 2026. The push centres on clearer, faster communication and stronger school-home partnership. CNAMinistry of Education

    The four focus areas (and what they mean on the ground)

    1. School culture, environment & processes
      • Sharper anti-bullying policies (zero-tolerance stance), updates to discipline + rehabilitation + restorative practices.
      • Reporting channels made more visible/accessible to students.
      • Expect clearer escalation paths and documentation. Ministry of EducationCNA
    2. Values education (CCE) with contemporary scenarios
      • More real-world cases (including online/cyber contexts) to build empathy, perspective-taking, and conflict resolution during CCE.
      • Aligns with existing CCE syllabus topics on bullying (online/offline). Ministry of Education+1
    3. Capacity & support for schools and educators
      • More professional development and use of technology to investigate, record, and communicate consistently.
      • Aim: quicker fact-finding and timely parent updates. Ministry of Education
    4. Stronger school-home partnerships
      • Build trust through mutually respectful, timely communication; refreshed School-Home Partnership guidelines will be emphasised.
      • Resources for parents on how to talk to children about hurtful behaviour. Ministry of Education

    Why now

    Recent high-profile cases (e.g., Sengkang Green PrimaryMontfort Secondary incidents) highlighted public anxiety and communication gaps; MOE also published a detailed timeline of the SKG case to improve transparency. CNAYahoo News

    What changes for each group

    • Students: Easier reporting; more peer-support and bystander empowerment; more explicit CCE scenarios about online/offline harm. Expect firmer follow-through (discipline and restoration). Ministry of Education
    • Parents: Earlier and clearer updates as facts are established; more guidance on monitoring online spaces (WhatsApp/Discord/socials) and constructive ways to engage schools. Ministry of Education
    • Educators/Schools: Tighter procedures, better tooling/training for investigations and communication; clearer policies to navigate grey areas; emphasis on documenting restorative steps and outcomes. Ministry of Education

    Timeline & next steps

    • Aug 27, 2025: Minister’s dialogue kicks off next phase of stakeholder engagement (parents, PSGs, educators, community). Ministry of Education
    • Now → end-2025: Consultations; deep-dives on the four areas. Ministry of Education
    • 1H 2026: MOE to release key recommendations and follow-up actionsMinistry of Education
  • Full SBB & SEC 2027: Subject Choice Guide for Sec 2 Students

    1) The rules that actually shape your choices

    • SEC from 2027: You’ll sit papers at G1/G2/G3 (by subject); your SEC reflects the subject + level taken. Ministry of Education
    • JC admissions (from 2028 JAE): Moves to L1R4 ≤ 16 (not L1R5). Of the 4 “R” subjects:
      • R1 = a HumanitiesR2 = a Mathematics/ScienceR3 = Humanities/Maths/ScienceR4 = any best subject. (So you must include at least one Humanities and one Math/Science among the 4.) Bonus-points cap is 3Ministry of Education+1
    • Poly Year 1 (from AY2028): Compute ELR2B2 ≤ 22 (Nursing ≤ 24). You may include one “[B]” subject at G2 or G3the other 4 must be G3. If both “[B]” subjects are G3, the lower-graded “[B]” is mapped down to G2 in scoring. (Course MERs still apply.) Ministry of Education
    • ITE (AY2028 onward): Entry to 3-year Higher Nitec set at G1direct 2-year Higher Nitec set at G2 (e.g., mixed G3/G2 students may enter 2-year Higher Nitec with ELMAB3 ≤ 19). Ministry of Education

    Translation: For JC, ensure you can form an L1R4 that includes both a Humanities and a Math/Science at G3 (strongly preferred). For Poly, plan for 4×G3 + 1 “[B]” subject (at G2 or G3) within the ELR2B2basket. For ITE, note the G1/G2 entry levels by course.


    2) Subject-choice workflow for Sec 2s (do this in order)

    Step A — Pick your likely pathway (you can keep two open):

    • JC (Science)JC (Arts)Poly (STEM/Eng/IT)Poly (Business/Media/Design), or ITE→Poly. This determines whether you must front-load G3 in certain subjects.

    Step B — Lock the compulsory core at a sensibly demanding level:

    • English (EL) and Mother Tongue (MTL)MathematicsScienceHumanities (with Social Studies) are required at upper sec; take them at G3 where you aim for JC/Poly, else at the level you can sustain. Ministry of Education

    Step C — Decide on Additional Mathematics (A-Math):

    • Strongly recommended if you’re eyeing JC H2 Maths or STEM diplomas; it builds the algebra/calculus base. (MOE frames A-Math as preparation for mathematics-related studies.) Ministry of Education

    Step D — Choose your Science route:

    • Pure Sciences (G3 Physics/Chemistry/Biology) suit JC Science and many STEM diplomas; Combined Scienceis fine for Poly Business/Design pathways. Match to your interests and stamina.

    Step E — Add one or two electives that fit your path & count smartly in scoring:

    • Examples: Computing, POA, D&T, Art, Music, F&N—offered at G1/G2/G3 depending on school. (Check your school’s offer list.) Ministry of Education+1

    Step F — Check the admissions math:

    • JC: Can you form L1 (EL/HMTL) + R1 (Humanities) + R2 (Math/Science) + R3 (Hum/Math/Science) at G3with target grades to hit L1R4 ≤ 16Ministry of Education
    • Poly: Do you have ≥4 G3 subjects in your ELR2B2 basket + 1 “[B]” subject (G2 or G3) to reach ≤22 (≤24 Nursing) and meet MERs? Ministry of Education
    • ITE: Are your subject levels aligned to G1/G2 entry for your intended courses? Ministry of Education

    3) Sample subject combinations (illustrative, adjust to your school’s offer)

    A) JC Science track (keep Poly STEM open)

    • EL (G3)MTL/HMTL (G3)Mathematics (G3)Additional Mathematics (G3)Physics (G3)Chemistry (G3)Full Humanities (G3)* (+ optional 8th subject)
    • Why it works: Easily forms L1R4 with Humanities in R1 and Math/Science in R2/R3; keeps Poly STEM options strong with ≥4×G3Ministry of Education+1

    B) JC Arts/Humanities track (keep Poly Business/Media open)

    • EL (G3)MTL/HMTL (G3)Mathematics (G3)Literature/History/Geography (G3)2nd Humanities (G3)Science (G2 or G3)Elective (e.g., Art/POA/Media, G2/G3)
    • Why it works: Meets L1R4 humanities/maths-science mix; choose one Science at G3 if you might pivot to JC Science later. Ministry of Education

    C) Poly Engineering / Computing

    • EL (G3)Mathematics (G3)Additional Mathematics (G3)Physics (G3)Computing or D&T (G3)Humanities (G2) as your [B] subjectMTL (G2/G3)
    • Why it works: 4×G3 + 1 “[B]” at G2 satisfies ELR2B2 ≤ 22 (target tighter to be competitive). Ministry of Education

    D) Poly Business / Media / Design

    • EL (G3)Mathematics (G3)Humanities (G3)POA/Art/Media (G3)Science (G2 as “[B]”)MTL (G2/G3)
    • Why it works: Still ≥4×G3 in basket; the [B] can be at G2. Check course MERs for specific relevant subjects. Ministry of Education

    E) ITE → Higher Nitec (with Poly in view later)

    • Prioritise EL, Math, and relevant Applied subjects at levels needed by your target course; ensure you meet G1 (3-year) or G2 (2-year) entry and aim for ELMAB3 ≤ 19 if you want direct 2-year Higher NitecMinistry of Education

    “Full Humanities” = taking a full G3 Humanities (e.g., full Geog/Hist/Lit) alongside Social Studies, not just the elective.


    4) Common pitfalls to avoid

    1. For JC hopefuls: Forgetting the mix rule—your L1R4 must include at least one Humanities and one Math/Science among the 4 relevant subjects. Don’t leave Humanities at too low a level. Ministry of Education
    2. For Poly hopefuls: Ending up with only 3 G3 subjects in your ELR2B2. You need 4×G3, with only one “[B]”allowed at G2Ministry of Education
    3. Dropping A-Math too early if you might need H2 Math/STEM diplomas. It’s the best preparation for higher-level math. Ministry of Education
    4. Misreading “Combined Science”—great for non-STEM pathways, but Pure Science(s) make the JC Scienceand many STEM diplomas smoother.
    5. Assuming all electives are offered at your school—check the school’s Sec 3 offer list and criteria (some require Sec 2 performance or placements). Ministry of Education

    5) Quick checklist (use this with your school’s options form)

    • What are my top 2 post-sec targets (e.g., JC Science + Poly Computing)?
    • Do I have ≥4 G3 subjects (Poly) and a valid L1R4 mix (JC)? Ministry of Education+1
    • If I’m considering JC later, am I keeping at least one full G3 Humanities and Math/Science at G3Ministry of Education
    • If I’m considering STEM, am I taking A-Math and at least one Pure Science at G3Ministry of Education
    • Which subject will be my potential [B] subject at G2 (for Poly scoring), if needed? Ministry of Education
    • Do my choices meet any course-specific MERs I care about (e.g., Nursing, Design, IT)? Ministry of Education
  • From O/N Levels to SEC: Common Exam Period Starts 2027

    1) Article in a nutshell (1-minute read)

    • One common exam window from 2027 when the new Singapore-Cambridge Secondary Education Certificate (SEC) replaces O- & N-Levels. First cohort: the 2024 Sec 1s (graduating in 2027). The Straits TimesMinistry of Education
    • Written papers split into two blocks: English & Mother Tongue in Septemberall other written subjectsfrom October to November. Non-written components (orals, listening, practicals) remain before the written papers. Ministry of Education
    • Single results release: January of the following year for everyone (previously N-Level in mid-Dec, O-Level in mid-Jan). CNA
    • Systems alignment: ITE moves to one intake in April from 2027 (same as polytechnics). CNA

    2) What this means for students & parents (Aug 2025)

    Who’s affected when

    • Sec 2 (2025) → Sec 4 in 2027First SEC cohort under the common window. Plan for EL/MTL in Sept; other subjects Oct–Nov. Ministry of Education
    • Sec 1 (2025) → Sec 4 in 2028: Will also sit SEC with the same schedule. Ministry of Education
    • Sec 3 (2025) → Sec 4 in 2026 and Sec 5 (if applicable) in 2027:
      • Most Sec 3 Express students finish with final O-Levels in 2026 (last O/N cohort). Those progressing to Sec 5 in 2027 will be on SEC/common window. Ministry of Education
    • Sec 4/5 (2025): Continue under the current O/N timetables. SEC/common window does not apply to your 2025 exams. Ministry of Education

    Practical implications (planning, admissions, logistics)

    • Study pacing & mock exams: With EL/MTL in September, schools/tutors should bring language drill earlier (Term 3) and keep subject-content peaks for Oct–Nov. There’s no mid-year MTL second sitting under SEC; prepare to get it right once. (MOE notes the old “second sitting” changed postings for <2% of candidates anyway.) CNA
    • Results & applications: Expect one January results release; JC/Poly/ITE application windows will bunch right after. Families should avoid long trips in early–mid JanuaryCNA
    • ITE pathway: From 2027only one ITE intake in April—important for those eyeing Higher Nitec; plan bridging time accordingly. CNA
    • Admissions criteria (Poly/JC) under SEC:
      • Poly Year 1 (AY2028 intake): assessed on a common 4 G3 + 1 G2 benchmark, with a net ELR2B2 cut-off adjusted to 22 (24 for Nursing). The “[B] subject” mapping from G3→G2 is standardised. Build subject mixes and targets with this in mind. Ministry of Education
      • JC/MI (from 2028 JAE): MOE has updated JC/MI criteria to reflect Full SBB/SEC. Check latest L1R4 details and subject-group requirements when choosing Sec 3 options. Ministry of Education

    Quick actions for parents & students

    • Mark the rhythm now: Sept = EL/MTL; Oct–Nov = all other written papers; January = results. Sync family calendars, tuition intensives, and CCAs accordingly. Ministry of EducationCNA
    • Choose Sec 3 subjects with SEC in mind: Mixed G1/G2/G3 combinations are fine—ensure they align with your target (JC/Poly/ITE) given the new admission benchmarks. Ministry of Education
    • If aiming ITE → Poly: Note the single April intake and plan for interim enrichment or internships between results and matriculation. CNA
  • National Day Rally 2025: Impact on Secondary Students

    What changes for secondary students (practical impact)

    1. More emphasis on character & citizenship + digital resilience. Schools will lean harder into values, empathy and judgment in an AI era; MOE will deploy more allied educators/teacher counsellors and put greater emphasis on Character & Citizenship Education (CCE). Expect more lessons and activities that train critical thinking about AI output and online content. The Straits Times
    2. AI use moves from “avoid/ban” to “guided/critical”. Teachers are encouraged to turn AI use into learning opportunities—critiquing AI answers, showing working, attribution, and responsible use. Students should expect clearer school rules on when/how AI can be used in homework and projects. Prime Minister’s Office
    3. Tougher anti-vaping regime, with school-linked education and referrals. Vaping will be treated as a drug issue with stiffer penalties (including jail for sellers of harmful vapes), plus a major public education drivethat explicitly targets youths. Schools will reinforce this with assemblies, CCE lessons, and referrals to cessation/support pathways where needed. CNA
    4. More visible well-being supports on campus. With extra counsellors/allied educators, students should see faster access to help for stress, anxiety, online harms or family issues, and more proactive whole-class well-being programmes. The Straits Times
    5. Sharper cyber-wellness expectations at home and in school. National guidance highlights limiting early-years screen time and, for older students, building digital resilience (healthy device rules, discerning media habits). Schools will likely tighten device norms and parent partnerships. gov.sg
    6. Pathways awareness will start earlier. While the government-funded traineeships target post-secondary/tertiary grads, schools may ramp up talks/expos on industries and AI-enabled jobs so students make better subject/post-secondary choices. CNA
  • Math Tutoring in 2025: Help Your Child Excel in an AI-Driven Exam System

    🧠 Is Your Child Being Tested for the Past—Or the Future?

    Why today’s exams may be failing tomorrow’s students (and what parents need to know)

    Every exam season, parents hope their children will excel and secure a better future. But here’s the problem: the exams our kids are sitting today weren’t designed for a world with AI.


    🚨 What’s Happening:

    Tools like ChatGPT and Google Gemini can now write essays, solve math problems, and even generate full reports at the click of a button.

    This raises a big question:

    Are our children being tested on what they know—or on what they can Google?


    🎯 Why It Matters to You as a Parent:

    • Exams still reward rote memorisation, not real-world skills like critical thinking, creativity, and collaboration.
    • In the age of AI, those outdated skills won’t help your child succeed in university or the workforce.
    • Worse, students who secretly use AI tools may appear smarter than they are—while honest students are left behind.

    👩‍🏫 What Educators Are Calling For:

    Experts say we must shift from testing memorised facts to teaching how to use AI wisely. That means:

    • Open-book, real-world assessments.
    • Tasks that require students to critique, improve, and adapt AI-generated work.
    • Preparing students to work with AI—not pretend it doesn’t exist.

    💡 A Key Thought:

    If your child is going to live in a world where AI is everywhere, shouldn’t their education reflect that reality?


    📌 What You Can Do as a Parent:

    • Ask your child’s school how they’re adapting to AI.
    • Encourage your child to use AI responsibly as a learning tool, not a shortcut.
    • Support curriculum changes that build future-ready skills, not just exam scores.

    https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/its-time-our-exams-caught-up-with-the-future

  • Full Subject-Based Banding in Secondary 1

    Overview of what Secondary 1 students (2024 cohort onwards) will experience under Full Subject-Based Banding (Full SBB) at secondary school:

    • Removal of Fixed Streams
      The traditional Express, Normal (Academic) and Normal (Technical) streams are abolished. Students are no longer placed into one of these three “tracks” for their entire secondary education.
    • Posting Groups Replace Streams
      • Students are assigned to one of three Posting Groups (1, 2 or 3) based on their PSLE aggregate.
      • These Posting Groups correspond to the old N(T), N(A) and Express ranges respectively, but only determine initial placement and subject-level recommendations at Secondary 1.
    • Three General Subject Levels (G1, G2, G3)
      • Across all schools, every subject is offered at three levels—G3 (most demanding), G2 (mid), and G1 (foundational).
      • At Secondary 1, students start most subjects at the level aligned with their Posting Group (e.g. Group 2 → mostly G2).
    • Flexible Subject Moves
      • Throughout secondary school, students can move up (e.g. from G2 to G3) or down (e.g. G3 to G2) for individual subjects, based on:
      1. Their performance and readiness in that subject
      2. A holistic assessment by the school (to ensure manageable workload)
    • Mixed Form Classes & Common Curriculum
      • Form classes are no longer streamed by ability—students of different Posting Groups learn together.
      • Six “Common Curriculum” subjects (Art, CCE, D&T, FCE, Music, PE) are taught in mixed classes, with differentiated instruction to meet varied learning paces.
    • Post-Secondary Pathways Based on Subject Levels
      • Admission to JCs, polytechnics, and other ITE programmes will depend on the combination of subjects and levels students take (e.g. L1R5 computed from G3 subjects for JC).
      • A fifth year option remains available for those who wish to pace their learning and take more G3 subjects to open up further pathways.

    What this means for students
    Under Full SBB, every student tailors their learning journey—choosing the level that best matches their strengths, refining it as they grow, and keeping doors open to all post-secondary options based on subject-level achievement rather than a fixed stream label.