A recent online dispute between a parent and a private tutor has been making its rounds — and it reveals something important about how we choose tutors for our children.

A mother refused to pay $600 in tuition fees because she said the tutor had “promised” her daughter would score A2–B3. The tutor insisted he never guaranteed outcomes — only that her daughter was capable of those grades based on her practice papers.

Both sides ended up threatening to bring the matter to the Small Claims Tribunal.

As dramatic as it sounds, this story is a valuable reminder for all parents

Let’s break down what every parent should take away from this.

---

1. No Tutor Can Guarantee Results — And You Should Be Careful If They Try

As parents, we naturally want the best — especially for Math and Science, where grades heavily influence subject combinations and post-secondary pathways.

But here’s the truth:

👉 No responsible tutor will guarantee a grade.
Because grades depend on many factors:

• The student’s consistency
• Their willingness to revise
• Stress levels during exams
• School exam difficulty (which varies yearly)
• Mastery across all topics, not just the tutor’s sessions

A good tutor can provide strong guidance, clear explanations, and structured revision, but the student still needs to apply effort, practise, and internalise concepts.

If any tutor says:
“I guarantee your child will get A1 / A2”

That’s a red flag.

---

2. What Tutors Can Guarantee (and What They Can’t)

A professional tutor can promise:

✔ Clear, structured lessons
✔ Syllabus-aligned materials and practice
✔ Regular feedback on weaknesses
✔ A supportive learning environment
✔ Exam-focused strategies
✔ Honest progress-tracking

But they cannot promise:

✘ A fixed grade
✘ That your child will outperform 100% of peers
✘ Miracle improvements in 4–6 sessions
✘ Guaranteed Last-Minute Exam Rescues™

Learning is a partnership, not a product purchase.

---

3. Why Miscommunication Happens — Even With Good Tutors

Most disputes arise from well-meaning conversations like:

“I think your child can get B3–A2 with consistent practice.”

Parents hear hope.
Students hear pressure.
Some interpret it as a promise.

This is why experienced tutors always:

• Manage expectations clearly
• Put everything in writing
• Track progress openly
• Avoid overly optimistic predictions

If a tutor never clarifies limits or avoids talking about learning attitude, something is off.

---

4. How Parents Can Avoid Tutor–Parent Conflicts

Here’s what you can do:

✔ Ask for a Written Agreement (Even a Simple One)

It should cover:

• Session schedule
• Fees and payment terms
• Cancellation policy
• What is included (materials, homework support, etc.)
• No-guarantee clause for exam results

Good tutors won’t object — it protects them and you.

---

✔ Focus on Teaching Quality, Not “Grade Packages”

Instead of asking:

“Can you guarantee an A?”

Try:

• “How do you help students who struggle with algebra/chemistry kinetics/etc.?”
• “What improvements can I expect in understanding, not just grades?”
• “How do you track progress?”
• “How do you help students who freeze in exams?”

A good tutor talks about skills, not promises.

---

✔ Look for Consistent Improvement, Not Magic

The best signs of a strong tutor are:

⭐ Your child starts asking better questions
⭐ They become more confident
⭐ They make fewer conceptual errors
⭐ They can explain their thinking
⭐ They revise without being nagged
⭐ School test scores show steady upward progress

Even a jump from C5 → B4 → B3 is real, meaningful progress.

---

5. The Bigger Picture: Trust and Transparency Matter More Than Hype

The viral story of the mother refusing to pay shows how quickly misunderstandings can happen when expectations are not aligned.

Many students take Math & Science tuition to secure Sec 3 streaming, subject combinations, and O-Level pathways, the goal should be:

👉 Find a tutor who teaches your child to think — not one who sells miracle grades.

Great learning happens when:

• Parents understand the process
• Tutors set realistic goals
• Students receive consistent guidance
• Everyone communicates clearly

---

For many families, PSLE results day is a huge emotional moment – relief, pride, worry, maybe all three at once. Before anything else: almost every child will have a place to move on to. In recent years, over 98% of Primary 6 students have been eligible to progress to secondary school each year. (CNA)

This post walks you through the main education paths after receiving PSLE results, and how to think about what’s best for your child – not someone else’s.

---

1. First, understand what the PSLE score actually means

Under the current PSLE system, each subject is given an Achievement Level (AL) from 1 to 8 (AL1 is best). Your child’s PSLE Score is the sum of their four ALs, ranging from 4 to 32, with 4 being the best. (rafflesgirlspri.moe.edu.sg)

Secondary 1 (S1) posting is based on:

1. Your child’s PSLE Score
2. Their six school choices and posting group
3. Tie-breakers if needed (citizenship, school choice order, and ballot) (rafflesgirlspri.moe.edu.sg)

From the 2024 Sec 1 cohort onwards, the old “Express / Normal (Academic) / Normal (Technical)” labels are gone. Instead, students are posted to schools through Posting Groups 1, 2 and 3, and will take most subjects at G1, G2 or G3 levels. (Ministry of Education)

• Posting Group 3 (PG3) ≈ used to be Express
• Posting Group 2 (PG2) ≈ used to be Normal (Academic)
• Posting Group 1 (PG1) ≈ used to be Normal (Technical) (peicaisec.moe.edu.sg)

The important mindset shift:

Your child is not “Express” or “Normal” anymore. They are a learner who can take different subjects at different levels, and move up when they’re ready. (Ministry of Education)

---

2. Main path: Secondary school under Full Subject-Based Banding (Full SBB)

From 2024, all schools with academic streams run Full Subject-Based Banding. That means:

• Students enter via Posting Groups 1–3, but
• They can take some subjects at a more demanding level, and others at a less demanding level, based on how they’re coping. (Ministry of Education)

For example:

• A child in PG2 (mostly G2 subjects) who is strong in Mathematics may be allowed to take Math at G3 from Sec 1. (Ministry of Education)

From 2027, students will sit for a common Singapore-Cambridge Secondary Education Certificate (SEC), rather than separate O-Level and N-Level exams. (Ministry of Education)

What this means for parents

When choosing a school, focus less on “Is my child Express-standard?” and more on:

• How supportive is the school in allowing movement between subject levels?
• What kind of learning environment, teachers and CCA culture will help my child grow?
• Can my child handle a heavier load of G3 subjects, or would a mix of G2/G3 be healthier?

The same PSLE score can still lead to very different experiences, depending on the school’s culture and how well it fits your child.

---

3. The Integrated Programme (IP): Through-train to JC or IB

Some students with strong academic performance may qualify for schools offering the Integrated Programme (IP).

The IP is a 6-year programme where students:

• Skip the national exam at Sec 4 (now the SEC / previously O-Levels), and
• Go straight to A-Levels, the International Baccalaureate (IB) Diploma, or the NUS High School Diploma at the end of Year 6. (Ministry of Education)

Typically, the IP is designed for academically strong students – about the top 10% of each Primary 6 cohort. (thelearninglab.com.sg)

Pros of the IP path

• More time for deeper learning, research projects, leadership, and enrichment instead of teaching towards a Sec 4 exam. (Ministry of Education)
• A more broad-based education that can benefit independent, self-driven learners.

Things for parents to consider

• IP is academically intense and fast-paced; not every bright child enjoys this style. (thelearninglab.com.sg)
• There is no Sec 4 national exam “safety net” – students who find IP unsuitable may transfer out, and MOE data suggests around 6–7% of IP students leave before completing the six years. (The Straits Times)

Ask yourself:

• Is my child naturally independent, or do they still need close structure?
• Would they thrive with more project work and self-directed learning, or feel overwhelmed?

A very strong PSLE score doesn’t automatically mean the IP is the “best” choice – it just opens another door.

---

4. Specialised and niche secondary school options

Depending on your child’s interests and strengths, there are other paths after PSLE besides a mainstream secondary school with Full SBB. These usually require good PSLE results and/or Direct School Admission (DSA) earlier in the year, but some may still matter at decision time.

Examples include:

• School of the Arts (SOTA) – for students with strong talent and commitment in the arts.
• Singapore Sports School (SSP) – for student-athletes serious about long-term sports development.
• NUS High School of Mathematics and Science – for students with deep interest and talent in STEM.
• Schools with specialised programmes (e.g. media, applied learning, STEM innovation) under MOE’s list of schools with specialised curriculum. (Ministry of Education)

These options work best when:

• Your child’s interest is genuine, not just parental aspiration, and
• You are prepared for the time and emotional commitment (e.g. training, performances, competitions).

---

5. For students with lower PSLE scores: What if my child struggled?

Every year, there are students whose scores fall on the lower end – and they still move on and do well in life.

Under the current system:

• Students who meet the minimum requirement (usually PSLE Score of 30 or better, with at least AL7 in English and Math) can still be placed in a secondary school in Posting Group 1. (rafflesgirlspri.moe.edu.sg)
• Those who do not qualify for any of the posting groups may be offered places in specialised schools such as Northlight School or Assumption Pathway School, or they may be allowed to re-attempt PSLE depending on MOE’s guidelines and the school’s assessment. (essentialeducation.com.sg)

If your child’s results are lower than expected, conversations could focus on:

• “How can we help you rebuild confidence in learning?”
• “Which environment would help you feel safe enough to try again?”
• “What are you good at outside of exams – practical skills, people skills, creativity, sports?”

The secondary school years are still a time of huge growth. Many late bloomers only find their footing in Sec 3–4 or in ITE / polytechnic.

---

6. Choosing a school: Beyond cut-off points

MOE publishes each school’s PSLE score range (first and last student posted in each posting group) as a reference – not a fixed “ranking”. (Ministry of Education)

Instead of only chasing the “best” COP, consider:

1. Fit with your child’s profile
   • Will your child be in the middle of the cohort, or struggling at the bottom?
   • Do they need a more nurturing environment, or do they enjoy healthy competition?
2. School culture and strengths
   • CCAs that excite your child
   • Student leadership, service-learning, sports or arts culture
   • Support for students who need more help (e.g. learning support, counselling)
3. Practicalities
   • Distance and travel time
   • School hours and co-curricular commitments
   • Siblings’ schools, caregiving arrangements

A useful family exercise:

• Shortlist 8–10 schools using SchoolFinder and PSLE score ranges, then
• Narrow down to 6 choices that balance aspirational, realistic, and safe options. (Ministry of Education)

---

7. How parents can support emotionally (not just logistically)

Acknowledge feelings first

Before talking about school choices, give space for your child to react to their results – joy, disappointment, or confusion are all normal.

You might say:

“I can see you’re feeling ___ about your results. That’s okay. Whatever the number, we’ll figure out the next step together.”

Separate the child from the score

Gently remind them:

• “This score reflects your performance in one exam, at one point in time.”
• “It does not measure your kindness, creativity, sense of humour, or potential.”

Research on motivation and resilience consistently shows that children do better when parents emphasise effort, strategies and growth, not just outcomes. (essentialeducation.com.sg)

Focus on next steps, not comparison

Instead of “Why didn’t you get into X school?”, try:

• “What kind of school environment do you think you’ll enjoy?”
• “Which CCAs or programmes sound exciting to you?”

This shifts the conversation from shame to possibility.

---

8. Summary: Many paths, one child

After PSLE, your child might:

• Enter a mainstream secondary school through Posting Groups 1–3,
• Start a Full SBB journey where subject levels can be adjusted over time,
• Join an Integrated Programme school,
• Attend a specialised school that matches a strong talent or interest, or
• Take a more customised path if they need more time and support.

Your role as a parent isn’t to pick the most “prestigious” path, but to help your child find a sustainable, healthy onewhere they can grow academically, emotionally, and as a person.

If you’d like, I can next help you:

• Interpret a specific PSLE score (e.g. 18, 23, 27) and
• Sketch out realistic school and pathway options for your child’s profile.

---

References

Ministry of Education. (2023). Full subject-based banding (Full SBB). (Ministry of Education)

Ministry of Education. (2025). FAQs: PSLE scoring and Secondary 1 posting. (Ministry of Education)

Ministry of Education. (2025). Curriculum for secondary schools: Schools offering Full SBB. (Ministry of Education)

Singapore Examinations and Assessment Board & Ministry of Education. (2023). PSLE results: 98.4% of students can progress to secondary school. Channel NewsAsia. (CNA)

Ministry of Education. (2023). Integrated Programme (IP). (Ministry of Education)

The Learning Lab. (2024). Integrated Programme vs O-Level. (thelearninglab.com.sg)

Bukit Timah Tutor. (2025). What is the Integrated Programme (IP) in Singapore? (Bukit Timah Tutor Secondary Mathematics)

Parents sometimes say, “In the real world, effort doesn’t count — only results do.”
And yes, workplaces typically reward outcomes, not the hours or attempts behind them.

But children are not miniature adults, and school is not the workplace.
Learning is a developmental journey — and development depends on effort, struggle, and guided practice.

If we expect workforce-level performance without giving children the space to build workforce-level thinking skills, we set them up for long-term frustration.

---

1. Effort Builds the Capabilities Needed for Future Outcomes

Research shows that effortful learning, especially through “desirable difficulties,” leads to deeper, more durable understanding (Bjork & Bjork, 2011). Students learn best when they are challenged just beyond their comfort zone, because they must think, adapt, and reorganise their understanding.

Adults are rewarded for outcomes because they have already developed:

• critical thinking
• metacognitive skills
• persistence
• executive functioning
• independence

Children are still building these capacities.
Effort is how they build them.

---

2. When We Reward Only Results, Children Avoid Difficult Tasks

If children believe only results matter, they naturally choose what feels safe: easier homework, familiar question types, memorisation instead of reasoning.

Decades of research by Dweck (2006) shows that praising only achievement fosters a fixed mindset — children become afraid of mistakes because they interpret difficulty as a sign they are “not good enough.” In contrast, children encouraged for effort and strategy use develop a growth mindset and are more willing to tackle harder problems.

In short:
Outcome-only environments create fear.
Effort-focused environments create growth.

---

3. Encouraging Effort Doesn’t Mean Praising Everything

Parents sometimes worry that praising effort leads to complacency — it doesn’t.

Effective encouragement focuses on productive effort, not empty praise.

Hattie and Timperley (2007) found that feedback is most powerful when it reinforces:

• strategic thinking
• persistence
• self-monitoring
• trying alternative approaches
• learning from mistakes

This kind of effort is exactly what builds the habits of successful learners and, later, successful workers.

---

4. School Is the Training Ground, Not a KPI-Driven Workplace

Vygotsky’s (1978) concept of the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) explains why learning requires tasks that are challenging but achievable with support. Children grow the most when they work in this zone — not when they only repeat what they already know.

School provides the scaffolding for this:

• multiple attempts
• opportunities to reflect
• timely feedback
• guided struggle

If children only encounter pre-taught, predictable questions, they never learn to transfer concepts to new contexts — a skill essential for polytechnic, JC, university, and adult life.

---

5. Students Who Learn to “Try Hard Things” Become Adults Who Deliver Results

Employers reward performance — but the adults who consistently perform well share common traits:

• resilience under pressure
• ability to break down unfamiliar problems
• adaptability
• independent reasoning
• persistence

Duckworth et al. (2007) found that perseverance and sustained effort (“grit”) strongly predict long-term achievement across academics, military performance, and career success.

These traits do NOT come from being given answers.
They come from repeated experiences of effortful learning.

---

So Yes—Jobs Reward Outcomes.

But Childhood Is Where We Build the Person Who Can Produce Those Outcomes.**

Children need space to:

• struggle safely
• make mistakes
• adjust strategies
• verbalise their thinking
• apply concepts in new situations
• keep trying when things feel unfamiliar

This is not “soft” learning.
This is the foundation for future excellence.

As parents, our goal is not to transform children into workers who chase KPIs.

Our goal is to raise thinkers — young people who can reason, adapt, and persist even when the answer isn’t obvious.

Those outcomes begin with effort.

---

References

Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2011). Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. Psychology and the Real World: Essays Illustrating Fundamental Contributions to Society, 56–64.

Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.

Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087–1101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Parents, breathe. The PSLE is designed as a checkpoint—a way to see how well your child has grasped the core concepts and skills taught in primary school. It’s not meant to reward rote drills or trick-test techniques. The emphasis is on understanding, application, and critical thinking—the same abilities your child will need in secondary school and beyond.

What the PSLE Really Measures

• Core mastery: Has your child understood the main ideas in English, Mother Tongue, Math, and Science?
• Application of concepts: Can they use what they know in new contexts, not just repeat steps from a worksheet?
• Thinking skills: Analysis, reasoning, and problem-solving—over and above memorising.

What Schools Are Doing (Beyond One Exam)

Schools build the “whole child” with:

• Applied Learning & CCE: Projects, real-world tasks, and values education.
• Co-curricular experiences: Leadership and teamwork that exams can’t fully capture.
• Diverse pedagogies: Teachers use inquiry-based, collaborative, and experiential learning—and adapt these across subjects and ages. Younger years look different from upper primary, but the goal is the same: curiosity, confidence, and independence.

International studies (like TIMSS) consistently show Singapore primary students are strong at reasoning and applying concepts—evidence that the classroom focus goes beyond drill-and-practice.

How This Helps Your Child in Secondary School

• Stronger foundations: A focus on mastery means fewer fragile gaps that resurface later.
• Transferable skills: Inquiry and collaboration prepare your child for team projects, investigations, and authentic tasks in secondary school.
• Growth mindset: When learning is about understanding and trying, not just scores, teens handle tougher content with more resilience.

What Parents Can Do (Practical, Proven, Doable)

1) Shift from “covering” to “understanding.”
Ask: “What idea did you learn? Show me how it works in a new example.”

2) Practice explaining, not just answering.
Have your child teach you a concept. If they can’t explain it simply, there’s more to learn.

3) Use real-life mini tasks.

• Math: Estimate grocery costs, compare unit prices.
• Science: Predict, test, and write a 3-line conclusion (“What I did, what I saw, what it means”).
• English: Discuss a short article’s main claim + evidence.

4) Nurture collaboration.
Encourage pair/peer practice: planning steps, sharing roles, giving feedback. These habits matter as much as marks.

5) Calibrate expectations.
Treat PSLE as a progress marker. Celebrate improvements in thinking, not just the final number.

6) Mind the well-being basics.
Sleep, movement, and downtime are non-negotiable for memory and mood. Over-training backfires.

Quick FAQs Parents Ask

“Is inquiry learning really happening everywhere?”
Yes—teachers are trained to integrate it across subjects and levels, adapting to students’ maturity and confidence.

“Can a single exam capture collaboration or creativity?”
Not entirely. That’s why schools run projects, CCAs, and applied learning alongside the PSLE to develop 21st-century competencies.

“So what’s the PSLE for, really?”
It checks core mastery at the end of primary school—one important milestone in a longer learning journey.

AI Will Transform Tools—Not the Heart of Learning

AI is everywhere, but for Singapore’s secondary students preparing for O-Level and N-Level math and science, the big picture is simple: AI will enhance lessons and practice, yet it won’t replace great teaching, strong content mastery, and exam-ready skills. Think “supercharged tools,” not a total classroom overhaul.

What AI Already Does Well for Students

• Faster practice generation: Unlimited question variants for algebra, kinematics, forces, stoichiometry, etc.
• Instant feedback loops: Step-by-step hints, error spotting, and targeted corrections.
• Personalised pacing: Adaptive drills that adjust difficulty to your child’s current level.
• Admin time saved: Teachers and tutors automate marking and lesson prep—more time for real teaching.

What Still Matters Most (and Always Will)

• Conceptual understanding: Grasping why formulas work (e.g., Newton’s laws, mole ratios) beats copy-pasting steps.
• Exam craft: Reading the question, managing time, and showing method for marks.
• Human coaching: Motivation, confidence, and mindset—especially when topics feel “impossible.”
• Ethical, smart AI use: Knowing when AI helps vs. when it hinders genuine learning.

Practical Tips for O-/N-Level Success with AI

1. Blend, don’t replace: Use AI for extra practice; consolidate with school notes and Ten-Year Series style questions.
2. Show workings: Even if AI suggests steps, your child should rewrite solutions by hand to build muscle memory.
3. Target weak spots: Feed AI a few recent questions your child missed; request similar problems at the same difficulty.
4. Exam simulation weekly: Turn off AI help, set a timer, mark strictly with rubrics, review errors, then use AI only to diagnose patterns.
5. Data > vibes: Track accuracy by topic (e.g., indices, simultaneous equations, separation techniques, electricity). Improve one cluster at a time.

For Parents Comparing Tuition Options

• Ask how the tutor integrates AI (question banks, feedback, analytics) without sacrificing fundamentals.
• Look for clear topic maps aligned to MOE syllabus and recent exam trends.
• Ensure written workings, error logs, and reflection are part of the routine—not just answers on a screen.

Bottom Line

AI is a powerful accelerator for practice, feedback, and personalisation. But the winning formula for secondary math and science remains: sound concepts + deliberate practice + exam technique + human guidance.

FAQ (SEO-friendly)

Q1: Can AI replace my child’s math/science tutor?
No. AI speeds up practice and feedback, but tutors provide diagnosis, motivation, and exam strategy.

Q2: Is it okay for my child to use AI to solve homework?
Yes—for hints and revision. For marks and mastery, they must show their own workings and understand each step.

Q3: What’s the best AI tool for O-/N-Level prep?
Choose tools that generate syllabus-aligned questions, give stepwise feedback, and allow printable working.

https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/ai-to-transform-education-more-likely-not-much-will-change

A Singapore family chose a slower, values-driven path—relocating abroad, prioritising unstructured learning and wellbeing. The surprise? Their teen self-studied for the Singapore-Cambridge Secondary Education Certificate (O-Level) and achieved stellar results, easing fears that stepping off the rat race means sacrificing outcomes.

Key Takeaways for Parents & Students

• Grades follow good habits: Less cram, more consistent self-study and curiosity—still led to top performance in the Singapore-Cambridge Sec Cert (O-Level).
• Wellbeing is a force multiplier: Lower stress, more sleep, nature, and hobbies improved focus and retention for O- and N-Level students alike.
• Autonomy matters: Student-led schedules built ownership, resilience, and identity beyond grades—crucial for Sec-level success.
• Cost vs. value: Cutting back on endless classes redirected time and money to purposeful practice and real-world learning.
• Mindset shift: Move from “tuition by default” to targeted coaching + deliberate practice for better results with less burnout.

Tutor’s Perspective: Applying This to Sec Math & Science (O- & N-Level)

• From hours to outcomes: Replace generic hours with diagnostic-led practice (spaced repetition, exam-style drills matched to O- and N-Level specs).
• Concept → Method → Mastery

Worried about reducing tuition? The goal isn’t less help—it’s the right help, at the right time, with measurable practice for O- and N-Level goals.

https://www.straitstimes.com/life/family-steps-away-from-singapores-education-arms-race

TL;DR (5 lines)

• SG teachers average ~47 hrs/week (above OECD avg).
• “Teaching” time is squeezed by invisible workload (admin, events, parent comms, discipline follow-ups).
• MOE emphasises holistic care and non-academic roles—valuable but time-intensive and boundary-blurry.
• Ex-teacher: burnout risk from large classes, constant parent messaging, and DIY logistics.
• Proposed fixes: smaller classes, admin/TA support, clearer boundaries, smarter use of AI/tools.

Key Problems Described

• 30/70 perception: ~30% direct instruction vs ~70% “other” (discipline cases, event logistics, risk forms, decorations, consent chasing).
• Boundary creep: Parents message after hours; helpful teachers reply → habit forms → erodes rest time.
• Holistic care paradox: “Care” is central, but where does it end? Emotional labour is heavy and often invisible.
• Large classes (≈38–40): Less individual attention; more incidents to follow up; heavy marking.
• Mentoring squeeze: Structured mentoring exists, but teachers struggle to find time to do it well.

What Works / Suggested Solutions

• Reduce class size (target ≤25; ≤15 for higher-needs groups) → more relationship time, fewer incidents, lower marking load.
• Hire Teacher Assistants/Admin Execs (not classroom co-teachers) to own logistics: bookings, buses, quotes, forms, materials prep.
• Recalibrate teaching load metrics: 1 hr of class ≠ 1 hr of office work—factor emotional and cognitive loadinto timetabling.
• Boundaries with parents: School-wide norms (contact windows, emergency-only after hours) + consistent non-response outside hours.
• Targeted tech/AI: Marking assistance, document workflows, consent/risk templates—replace low-value admin, not add new tasks.

Implications

• For MOE/policy: If the system prizes holistic care and individualisation, it strengthens the case for smaller classes and non-teaching manpower.
• For schools/leaders: Centralise logistics, protect prep periods as sacrosanct, audit “invisible tasks.”
• For parents: Respect contact hours; use official channels; avoid last-minute queries—partner teachers, don’t “service-provide” them.

Pull-Quotes

• “Teaching often feels like 30% lessons, 70% everything else.”
• “Care is core—but where are the limits?”
• “Smaller classes + admin help would change everything.”
• “One scuffle can mean an hour of follow-up.”

TL;DR: Singapore teachers work some of the longest hours globally and report higher stress than the OECD average. Much of the strain comes from admin and marking—yet teachers are also among the world’s most active users of AI in class. Here’s what that means for your teen, and how you can help.

Key takeaways at a glance

• Work hours & stress: Full-time teachers here average 47.3 hours/week (OECD avg: 41). 27% report “a lot” of stress (OECD avg: 19%), up 4 percentage points since 2018. Younger teachers (<30) feel it more. CNA
• Where time goes: Teachers spend 4 hours/week on admin (OECD avg: 3), 6.4 hours on marking (OECD avg: 4.6). They teach 17.7 hours and prepare 8.2 hours weekly (OECD avgs: 22.7 teaching; 7.4 prep). CNA
• Top stressors: (1) Too much administrative work, (2) too much marking, (3) being held responsible for student achievement. CNA
• Resignations remain low: Average annual resignation rate stays around 2–3%—lower than other civil service schemes. CNA
• High digital & AI adoption: 75% of teachers use AI for teaching (OECD avg: 36%); most say AI helps with lesson planning (82%) and admin automation (74%). 81% worked in schools doing online/hybrid lessons in the month before the survey (OECD avg: 16%). CNA+1

Why this matters for your child

1. Teacher bandwidth impacts feedback speed. With notable time on admin and marking, feedback cycles can stretch—especially around exam seasons. Expect occasional delays in returned scripts or parent replies. CNA
2. Lesson prep is intensive. Teachers are investing more time crafting and curating lessons. That often translates to richer in-class activities and better-aligned resources for your teen. CNA
3. Wellbeing links to classroom climate. Higher stress doesn’t mean lower care—it means capacity is tight. A supportive school-home partnership helps teachers stay focused on student learning. CNA

What to do as a parent (practical tips)

• Use official channels—and respect boundaries. MOE emphasises baseline expectations for communication; teachers aren’t expected to respond outside school hours except for emergencies. If something’s urgent, state that clearly; otherwise, give 1–2 working days. CNA
• Make your emails “easy to answer.” One topic per message, a clear question, bullet-pointed context, and any required documents attached. This reduces back-and-forth in already packed schedules. (This aligns with the survey’s finding that admin load is a key stressor.) CNA
• Leverage school platforms. Submit forms and MCs promptly via Parents Gateway or school systems to cut admin. MOE has piloted tech to streamline processes—use them. CNA
• Prioritise parent-teacher time. Save complex discussions for scheduled meetings (e.g., PTM or a set appointment) so teachers can prepare data on your teen’s progress.

The AI angle: what it means for learning at home

• Expect AI-assisted lesson design. Many teachers use AI to refine lesson plans and generate materials. If your teen mentions AI-driven quizzes, exemplars, or feedback, that’s increasingly normal. CNA+1
• Homework may shift. With AI easing administrative tasks, teachers can assign more targeted practice and higher-order tasks (explanations, reflections, real-world applications). Support your teen to go beyond “right answers” to “clear reasoning.” CNA
• Model responsible AI use at home. Encourage your teen to use school-approved tools for brainstorming and draft feedback—while citing sources and avoiding plagiarism. Teachers are familiar with AI in the workflow; responsible habits matter. CNA

What the system is doing

MOE says it is streamlining non-teaching duties (e.g., exam admin cut by ~10%), setting communication baselines, and investing in automated marking and AI assessment tools to ease marking loads—aimed at returning more teacher time to teaching. CNA

Bottom line

Your child’s teachers are working long hours under high expectations, but they’re also early adopters of effective digital and AI tools. Clear, respectful communication and smart use of school systems can lighten the admin burden—freeing teachers to focus on what helps your teen most: thoughtful instruction, timely feedback, and wellbeing. CNA+2CNA+2

Source: CNA coverage of the 2024 OECD Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS), published Oct 7, 2025.CNA

If your teen is in secondary school, you’ll soon notice Art lessons feel different in a good way. Singapore’s refreshed Art syllabus puts ideas and thinking at the centre, with strong support for communication, reflection, and ethical use of technology (including AI). Here’s what that means for your child and how you can support them at home.

---

What’s actually changing?

1) Ideas over “perfect products”

Students still learn skills (drawing, painting, photography, digital tools), but the real emphasis is on how they generate, test, and communicate ideas. Sketchbooks, mood boards, mind maps, and critique conversations now carry more weight because they show how thinking evolves.

2) Real-world relevance (and local flavour)

Lessons lean on pop culture your teen already knows, local artists, and everyday issues (e.g., ageing, environment, public spaces). The aim: help students see Art as a visual language that can influence perceptions and create positive change here in Singapore.

3) AI as a tool, not the driver

Older students may design with AI (e.g., image generation, layout suggestions) and—crucially—learn to question it. Expect guided discussions about authorship, bias, originality, and ethics. Tech should serve a student’s idea, not replace it.

4) Clearer progression

Lower Sec builds broad confidence and visual literacy; Upper Sec deepens concept, research, iteration, and critique. Where relevant, subject levels (G1/G2/G3/Higher Art) align expectations while keeping the core philosophy consistent: process + communication + craft.

What a week in Art might look like now

• Concept brief: “Design a ‘helper’ object/creature to improve community life in your HDB estate.”
• Research: Students collect references from local spaces, interview family/peers, and study relevant artists or designs.
• Iteration: Multiple sketches or mockups—including one AI-assisted trial—with notes on what changed and why.
• Critique: Peers give feedback on the idea (not just neatness), and students document how they’ll improve.
• Reflection: Short write-up: What problem are you solving? Which choices communicate your intent? How did tech help—or hinder—your vision?

---

How assessment is evolving (what counts)

Traditional craft still matters—but marks are increasingly balanced across:

1. Idea + Intent
   Can your child clearly explain the problem, message, or theme?
2. Process Evidence
   Research depth, trials/iterations, risk-taking, and how they respond to feedback.
3. Communication & Reflection
   Artist statements, captions, page layouts, and critique notes.
4. Craft & Finish
   Technique, control of media, presentation quality.
5. Ethical Tech Use (when applicable)
   Original prompts, proper attribution, clear separation between AI outputs and student-made elements, and thoughtful reflection on limitations.

Published context: CNA reports that AI-powered “tutors” are becoming popular, pitching lower cost and convenience versus traditional tuition—yet experts and MOE flag important caveats. (Article date: 26 Sep 2025.) (CNA)

What exactly is an “AI tutor”?

Think chat-style study assistants and practice platforms that explain concepts, generate questions, and mark answers—often tailored to Singapore syllabuses. Examples in the CNA piece include platforms like Tutorly, WizzTutor, and a Telegram bot, “The Wise Otter.” (CNA)

Why parents are interested

• On-demand help at home: Students ask questions the moment they’re stuck, without waiting for the next lesson. One parent interviewed called it “a gamechanger” compared with ferrying kids to physical centres. (CNA)
• Lower, transparent pricing: CNA cites a typical range of S$20–S$120/hour for 1-to-1 tuition and up to S$172 per secondary lesson (≈ S$688/month) at name-brand centres, versus app subscriptions (e.g., Tutorly ~S$49/month)—a big gap for families. (CNA)
• Rising tuition spend: Households spent S$1.8b in 2023 on private tuition (up from S$1.4b in 2018), so cheaper options naturally get attention. (CNA)

MOE’s position (and what it means for you)

• Registration: MOE told CNA that AI learning tools for self-directed use do not need to register under the Education Act. (Under the Act, centres offering tuition/enrichment to ≥10 students must register.) In short: using an AI study app at home isn’t the same as enrolling in a registered tuition centre. (CNA)
• Use responsibly: MOE encourages parents and students to exercise discretion and use such tools safely and responsibly. (CNA)

The big caveat: “shortcut thinking”

Lecturers and educators interviewed warn that some bots will hand over answers when nudged (“I don’t know”)—great for speed, not for learning. The healthiest use is to treat AI as a thinking partner, not an answer vending machine. (CNA)

Will AI replace human tutors?

Unlikely, say experts. Expect hybrid models: AI for practice/explanations, humans to motivate, coach, and set context. Even AI-forward firms told CNA they’re expanding both in-person and online support. (CNA)

---

A parent’s checklist: choosing and using AI tutors well

1) Match to your child’s syllabus and needs
Look for platforms that explicitly cover your child’s level/subjects (e.g., Sec 1 Math vs JC Chem) and provide explanations, worked steps, and practice—not just final answers. (CNA)

2) Probe the pedagogy
Before paying, test whether the bot asks guiding questions, shows worked solutions, and lets your child explain their reasoning back (not just “here’s the answer”). CNA’s trial found some bots give answers too readily; favor those that scaffold thinking. (CNA)

3) Compare true costs
Stack subscriptions (e.g., ~S$49/month cited for Tutorly) against your current tuition spend (CNA notes up to S$172 per secondary lesson at brand-name centres). Hybrid pairing—fewer tuition hours + AI practice—can stretch budgets without losing human support. (CNA)

4) Keep a human in the loop
Build a weekly rhythm: your child studies with AI, then debriefs with a parent/tutor/teacher on misconceptions and habits. Experts interviewed emphasize that motivation and accountability still need humans. (CNA)

5) Safety & data hygiene
Follow MOE’s nudge to use tools “safely and responsibly.” Encourage your child not to paste personal data, set device-time limits, and review chat histories together for quality and appropriateness. (CNA)

6) Watch for real learning signals
Prefer platforms that let you see:

• Error patterns (what topics trip them up),
• Progress over time, and
• Reflection prompts (“What did I learn?” not only “Was I right?”). Educators in the article stress normalising that reflection. (CNA)

---

When an AI tutor makes sense—and when it doesn’t

Good fit:

• Your child is self-motivated and needs quick clarifications outside lesson hours.
• Budget is tight and you want more practice volume between human-led sessions. (CNA)

Not enough on its own:

• Your child avoids effort and hunts for shortcuts;
• They need structured coaching, exam strategy, or emotional support (confidence, mindset), which experts say technology still struggles to replace. (CNA)

---

Bottom line for Singapore parents

AI tutors are a useful amplifier—not a silver bullet. Used well, they can reduce costs, boost practice, and free up your human tutor or teacher to focus on higher-order coaching. But to protect true learning (and attention spans), keep humans in the loop, insist on worked reasoning, and follow MOE’s advice to use these tools wisely and safely. (CNA)

Source: CNA’s “AI tutors are on the rise. Could they disrupt Singapore’s billion-dollar tuition industry?” (26 Sep 2025). (CNA)