The School Bell SG — Timely updates for students and parents

Artificial intelligence is changing how students learn, search for information and complete schoolwork. For parents of secondary school students, this raises an important question: What skills will our children still need when AI can provide explanations, generate essays and solve many routine problems within seconds?

At a public engagement session on the future of education, Minister of State for Education Jasmin Lau highlighted three abilities that students will increasingly need: discernment, problem-solving and effective communication. While schools already teach aspects of these skills, the education system may need to provide students with more opportunities to practise and demonstrate them in real situations.

For parents, the message is clear. Academic knowledge remains important, but preparing a child for the future can no longer be limited to examination results.

Knowing the answer is not the same as understanding it

AI has made information easier to obtain than ever before. A student can ask a chatbot to explain a science concept, suggest points for a history essay or provide the working for a mathematics question.

The challenge is that AI-generated answers may be incomplete, misleading or simply wrong. Students must therefore learn to evaluate what they receive instead of accepting it immediately.

Discernment means being able to ask:

• Does this answer make sense?
• What evidence supports it?
• Is the source reliable?
• Has the AI misunderstood the question?
• Can I explain the answer in my own words?

Parents can develop this habit by asking their child to explain how an answer was obtained. Rather than simply checking whether homework has been completed, ask: “Why do you think this answer is correct?” or “How could you verify it?”

The goal is not to stop students from using AI. It is to teach them to remain intellectually responsible when using it.

Protect the thinking process

One danger of AI is that it can remove the productive struggle involved in learning.

When students immediately request a complete solution, they may obtain the correct answer without developing the reasoning required to solve a similar question independently. This is especially relevant in subjects such as mathematics and science, where understanding the steps is more important than copying the final response.

Parents can encourage a “think first, AI second” routine:

1. Attempt the question independently.
2. Identify the exact point of difficulty.
3. Ask AI for a hint or explanation rather than a complete answer.
4. Close the AI response and redo the question unaided.
5. Check the answer against notes, textbooks or a teacher’s explanation.

Used in this way, AI becomes a tutor rather than a substitute for thinking.

Human communication still matters

Ms Lau also expressed concern that increasing reliance on AI could gradually weaken human communication and relationships. In the past, a child who did not understand something might ask a parent, teacher or friend. Today, the child may turn immediately to an AI tool instead.

The AI response may be quick and convenient, but something valuable can be lost: conversation.

A discussion about homework can lead to a broader conversation about school, friendships, confidence or stress. These interactions help parents understand what their children are experiencing.

Parents do not need to know the answer to every academic question. Saying, “I’m not sure, but let’s work it out together,” can model curiosity, humility and problem-solving.

At home, parents can also create regular periods where conversations are not interrupted by phones or devices. Shared meals, short walks and journeys to school can become opportunities for children to express themselves without feeling that every discussion must be about grades.

Grades matter, but they should not consume family life

Participants at the education discussion also raised concerns about excessive emphasis on grades and the difficulty of supporting a child’s wider development.

Many Singapore parents understand that results are not the only measure of success. However, putting this belief into practice can be difficult when children face tests, homework, CCAs and packed tuition schedules.

One parent at the session noted that weekend tuition may improve a student’s confidence through smaller-group teaching, but it can also reduce family time. A counsellor similarly described the tension parents experience when deciding whether to discuss homework or ask about their child’s friendships and daily experiences.

The issue is therefore not whether tuition is always good or bad. Parents should consider whether each additional class is solving a genuine learning problem.

Useful questions include:

• Is my child attending because of a specific learning gap?
• Is the class helping my child become more independent?
• Is my child getting enough sleep and rest?
• Has tuition reduced time for family, exercise or personal interests?
• Are we adding lessons mainly because we are anxious?

Tuition should support learning, not create a schedule so crowded that the child has no opportunity to develop responsibility, resilience or relationships.

Allow children to experience manageable failure

Another important point raised during the session was the value of failure.

MOE deputy director-general of education Sng Chern Wei described schools as safe places where children can experience setbacks, such as disappointing test results, friendship difficulties or unsuccessful attempts at a task. Parents should not solve every problem or shield children from every failure, because students need to learn that setbacks are temporary and manageable.

This can be uncomfortable for parents. When a child is struggling, the natural instinct is to intervene.

However, solving every problem can unintentionally communicate: “You cannot handle this without me.”

A more helpful response may be:

• “What do you think went wrong?”
• “What could you try next?”
• “Who can you approach for help?”
• “What have you learnt from this?”
• “Would you like me to listen, advise or help you make a plan?”

The objective is not to leave children unsupported. It is to provide enough guidance for them to recover and act independently.

A poor test result, disagreement with a friend or unsuccessful CCA application can become a valuable learning experience when the child is helped to reflect rather than rescued immediately.

The skills parents should look for

As AI becomes more capable, parents may need to broaden their definition of progress.

In addition to examination results, look for whether your child is becoming better able to:

• explain ideas clearly;
• question unreliable information;
• solve unfamiliar problems;
• work with others;
• ask for help appropriately;
• accept constructive feedback;
• recover from mistakes;
• make responsible decisions;
• use technology without depending completely on it.

These abilities may not always appear on a report card, but they will matter greatly in further education, employment and adult life.

A practical approach for families

Parents do not need an elaborate AI policy at home. A few consistent expectations can make a meaningful difference.

Encourage your child to declare when AI has been used for schoolwork. Ask them to verify important information and explain submitted work in their own words. Create some device-free family time. Praise effort, judgement and improvement rather than only high scores. Most importantly, allow your child to face age-appropriate challenges while remaining available for guidance.

The central lesson is not that students must compete against AI.

They must learn to work alongside it without surrendering their judgement, independence or ability to connect with other people.

For parents of secondary school students, the most valuable preparation may therefore be helping children become thoughtful learners, confident problem-solvers and resilient young people—not merely efficient users of technology.

https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/parenting-education/schools-must-help-students-build-discernment-problem-solving-skills-in-ai-age-jasmin-lau

As we head into September, the mid-year lull is officially over. For parents of secondary school students in Singapore, the countdown to the end-of-year exams, O-Levels, and N-Levels is on.

You might have seen a recent article in The Straits Times discussing how primary school students prepare for the PSLE. While that article focused on younger children, the core advice is incredibly relevant—perhaps even more so—for teenagers facing the grueling demands of secondary school exams.

Here is how you can adapt the power of past-year papers to help your teen build the stamina and strategy they need to excel.

1. Train the “Exam Muscle”

In secondary school, exam papers get significantly longer and more demanding. Just like physical exercise, taking exams is like a muscle that needs to be trained. By sitting down to do full past-year papers, teens can build up the stamina required to focus continuously for long durations without mental fatigue setting in.

2. Expose Them to Curveballs

Relying solely on one school’s revision materials might leave your teen with blind spots. Different school curriculum teams often have entirely different ideas of how the same topic could be applied in various scenarios. Encouraging your teen to do a variety of papers from different schools helps sharpen their understanding of topics and exposes them to the diverse kinds of questions they might encounter.

3. Simulate the Real Exam Environment

It is not just about knowing the answers; it is about managing the environment. Practicing under simulated exam conditions helps students manage time calmly and become familiar with exam flow and pressure. To do this effectively at home:

• Set a strict timer for the “exam”.
• Ensure your teen has every piece of stationery they will need beforehand, such as pens, pencils, rulers, and erasers, so they are not getting up to find things.
• Remind them that doing papers without a timer can be useful for mastering specific formats or concepts, but timed practice is essential to learn how to perform under pressure.

4. Strategy Over Volume: Fix Weaknesses First

It is tempting to just print out a stack of papers and tell your teen to get to work. However, if a student’s score is already low, simply forcing them to do another full paper is unlikely to help much. Instead, parents and students need to ensure that underlying conceptual weaknesses are first identified and corrected before jumping back into full-length timed practices.

5. Teach the Art of Skipping

Time management is often the biggest hurdle in secondary school exams. A crucial exam strategy your teen must learn is how to allocate time per page based on the number of marks. They should be prepared to skip a page or a difficult question if they exceed their self-imposed time limit, returning to it only if there is excess time at the end. This ensures they secure all the easier marks first rather than panicking over a single tough question.

The Takeaway Preparation is more than just memorizing textbooks. By strategically using past-year papers to build focus, simulate pressure, and identify gaps, you can help your teen walk into their secondary school exams with confidence.

As parents in Singapore, we’ve all felt the heat of the local “education arms race” at some point. Whether your child is currently navigating the intense teenage years of secondary school or you are looking back at the primary school years, big changes are brewing in our landscape.

According to a Straits Times report from June 28, 2026, the Ministry of Education (MOE) has officially launched its first public engagement session aimed at relooking the system and dialing down the academic pressure. Led by Education Minister Desmond Lee, the session gathered around 160 parents, educators, students, and industry leaders to discuss the future of our children’s education.

If you are wondering how this impacts your secondary schooler, here are the key takeaways from the ground.

1. Reviewing the DSA Scheme and High-Stakes Exams

For parents of secondary school students, the Direct School Admission (DSA) scheme is a major milestone. The article in image.png highlights that the DSA scheme is currently under review, alongside discussions on how to moderate the high stakes associated with major exams like the PSLE.

Participants openly discussed the intense emotional and mental pressure these checkpoints place on 12-year-olds, noting that children at that age often aren’t fully equipped to handle it. The goal moving forward is to find a healthier balance so that education feels less like a pressure cooker and more like a place to grow.

2. Real-World Skills Over Rote Memorization

The curriculum is getting a hard look to ensure it stays relevant to the future workforce. The focus is shifting away from a pure fixation on academic grades and moving toward cultivating holistic life skills.

According to the discussions, future school experiences will place a heavier emphasis on:

• Core Soft Skills: Equipping students with collaboration, resilience, communication, and adaptability.
• Holistic Development: Strengthening Character and Citizenship Education (CCE) alongside Co-Curricular Activities (CCAs).

3. Proof That Success Isn’t Linear

One of the most encouraging stories shared in the article is that of 23-year-old Constance Han. Her journey is a fantastic reminder for any parent worried about their child’s stream or current academic performance:

• She started in the Normal (Academic) stream in secondary school.
• She then progressed to the Institute of Technical Education (ITE).
• From there, she moved to applied chemistry at Singapore Polytechnic.
• Today, she is a second-year environmental science student at Nanyang Technological University (NTU).

As Constance beautifully put it, removing the pressure of exams gives students the “space to explore and pursue our strengths”.

“Mental Health and Happiness Come First”

Elina Gwee, a parent featured in the article, shared her refreshing approach to raising her two children (aged 20 and 13). With a daughter in Secondary 1 at Raffles Girls’ School and a hands-on son who pursued mechatronics after Tampines Secondary, she emphasizes that children have completely different learning inclinations. Her golden rule? Prioritize mental health and happiness, because children will still find their way to success regardless of the route they take.

How to Have Your Say

This session is just the beginning. The MOE plans to run these public education conversations all the way until 2027 to gather more perspectives from parents, young working adults, and students.

If you want to voice your thoughts on how the system can better support your teenager, you can sign up for upcoming in-person sessions via moe.gov.sg. Let’s keep working toward an education system that values our children for who they are, not just the grades on their report cards!

President Tharman Shanmugaratnam’s recent remarks at the University of Dar es Salaam carry a message that is highly relevant to parents of secondary school students in Singapore: education is not just about grades, certificates or future salaries. Schools must help young people believe that they can make a difference.

Speaking during his state visit to Tanzania, President Tharman said young people need education and skills, but also a deeper sense of agency: the belief that they can contribute to society and shape the future around them. That idea matters greatly in Singapore, where many teenagers are under pressure to perform academically, choose the “right” subject combination, and keep up in a fast-changing world.

For parents, the key takeaway is this: our children need more than exam readiness. They need confidence, purpose and practical capabilities.

President Tharman pointed to Singapore’s own education journey. The country did not simply expand universities for the sake of producing more graduates. Instead, Singapore built up polytechnics, the Institute of Technical Education and universities in a way that linked education to skills, jobs and dignity. The goal, he said, was to ensure that people leaving the education system could find work, improve their prospects and live with dignity.

This is an important reminder for families with secondary school children. The “best” path is not always the most academically prestigious one. A student who discovers strength in applied learning, design, technology, healthcare, business, engineering, hospitality or the arts may thrive through many different routes. What matters is whether the route builds real capabilities and keeps doors open.

Parents can support this by asking better questions at home. Instead of only asking, “What marks did you get?”, we might ask:

“What problem did you learn to solve?”

“What are you getting better at?”

“What kind of work feels meaningful to you?”

“Where do you think you can contribute?”

Secondary school is a powerful season for forming identity. Teenagers are not just preparing for O-levels, N-levels or subject-based banding choices. They are quietly forming beliefs about whether they matter, whether their abilities are useful, and whether the future has space for them.

President Tharman also spoke about parenting itself, saying that raising children should be a shared responsibility and seen not as a burden, but as a joy. That may be the most personal lesson for parents: our children’s confidence is shaped not only by school systems, but also by the emotional climate at home.

A teenager who feels trusted, listened to and guided is more likely to take ownership of learning. A teenager who is only measured may become afraid of failing. The challenge for parents is to hold both standards and warmth: to encourage effort and discipline, while also helping our children see that their worth is bigger than any one exam result.

In a world being reshaped by artificial intelligence, climate change and shifting job markets, Singapore’s young people will need adaptability, resilience and purpose. Schools have a role to play, but parents do too.

The real question is not just, “How can my child succeed?”

It is also, “How can my child grow into someone who believes they can contribute?”

That belief may be one of the most important things a secondary school education can give.

Source: The Straits Times article, published June 10, 2026 and updated June 11, 2026.

If you have a teen in secondary school, chances are you’ve already caught them using tools like ChatGPT or Gemini to brainstorm an English essay or figure out a tricky Math problem. Recently, the Ministry of Education (MOE) sparked a nationwide conversation by announcing the supervised rollout of proprietary AI tools for students starting from Primary 4.

While a recent CNA commentary by writer and parent Annie Tan focuses on the impact of this rollout on primary schoolers, her insights offer a crucial wake-up call for parents of secondary school students who are already deep into the world of AI-assisted learning.

Here is a summary of the key takeaways from the article, tailored for parents navigating the teenage years:

1. The Allure of the “AI Shortcut”

The author notes how quickly her own children gravitated towards using AI for instant answers, calling its speed and simplicity “game-changing.” For secondary school students juggling multiple subjects, CCAs, and O-Level or N-Level preparations, the temptation to use AI as a shortcut is immense. However, the commentary warns that real-world problem-solving rarely works like a perfectly prompted AI query. If our teens get too used to instant, frictionless answers, they might become deeply uncomfortable with the messy, human process of real learning.

2. The Importance of “Productive Struggle”

Perhaps the most powerful point made in the article is the value of “productive struggle.” Traditional learning involves dealing with uncertainty, struggling to understand complex topics, and occasionally facing negative feedback or rejection. An AI tutor that is infinitely patient, sycophantic, and perfectly tailored to the student might actually rob them of the chance to build emotional resilience and frustration tolerance. These are traits our teenagers desperately need to navigate both adolescence and the future workplace.

3. Knowledge vs. Wisdom

As a fellow parent in the article aptly pointed out, knowledge is not wisdom. AI can easily boost a student’s factual knowledge, but wisdom is gained by making choices with incomplete information, making mistakes, and living through the stress of fixing them. The author highlights a 2025 study showing that heavy AI usage correlates with lower scores on critical thinking tests. During these crucial teenage years when cognitive muscles and a sense of self are still forming, over-reliance on AI could inadvertently stunt independent thought and creativity.

4. The Spillover Effect at Home

MOE is taking a highly supervised approach by using MOE-developed tools with built-in guardrails, rather than giving kids open access to general-purpose AI. But the author rightly questions the spillover effect at home. Once students experience how quickly AI can scaffold arguments and generate ideas in school, they are likely to seek out broader AI tools at home. For parents already fighting daily battles over screen time and social media, managing and monitoring safe AI use becomes yet another taxing responsibility.

The Bottom Line for Parents

In today’s “AI arms race,” it is natural to feel anxious that if our teens don’t fully optimise their learning with AI, they will be left behind in the future workforce. However, the ultimate message of the commentary is grounding: AI-accelerated learning cannot come at the expense of uniquely human skills.

As parents of secondary schoolers, our focus shouldn’t just be on whatour teens are producing with AI, but howthey are growing in the process. We need to ensure that their communication skills, confidence, and self-determination aren’t bypassed in the pursuit of productivity. Let’s continue to encourage our teens to wrestle with difficult concepts, accept imperfection, and remember that sometimes, the struggle is exactly what makes them capable adults.

Will Caning Stop School Bullies? What Singapore Parents Need to Know About MOE’s New Disciplinary Framework

As parents, nothing makes our blood boil faster than the thought of our child being bullied. Our first instinct is often to step in, seek justice, and demand that the perpetrator be punished.

Recently, the Ministry of Education (MOE) announced that by 2027, every school in Singapore will follow standard disciplinary measures for misconduct. The headline that immediately divided parents, teachers, and parliamentarians? School bullies can now receive up to three strokes of the cane. While some parents welcome this as a necessary deterrent, others view it as violence begetting violence. A recent episode of The Usual Place podcast tackled this heated debate, featuring insights from education reporter and former teacher Alicia Tyshara, alongside Ang Boon Min, CEO of the Singapore Children’s Society.

Here is a breakdown of the conversation and what it means for us as parents of secondary school students.

Does Caning Actually Work?

The short answer: It’s complicated.

Corporal punishment can certainly bring about quick, short-term compliance. For a student who isn’t used to physical discipline, the fear and embarrassment of being caned might be enough to stop the bad behavior in its tracks.

However, for long-term behavioral change, caning falls short. Former teacher Alicia Tyshara noted that some recalcitrant students actually wear their punishment like a “badge of honor” among peers, or get creative by padding their clothes with tissue paper. If a child is already desensitized to physical punishment at home, caning at school loses its impact. More importantly, it doesn’t teach a child why their behavior was harmful or how to change it.

Looking Past the “Bully” Label

One of the biggest takeaways from the experts is the need to shift our language and mindset. Instead of permanently labeling kids as “bullies” or “victims,” we should refer to them as “children who engage in bullying behavior” and “children who experience bullying.”

This isn’t just about being politically correct; it’s about recognizing that a child’s identity isn’t fixed. Often, bullying behavior stems from an unmet need or a lack of social skills. A child might tease others because it gets a laugh and makes them feel popular, or they might bully others as a defense mechanism because they were previously bullied themselves. Understanding the root cause is crucial to stopping the cycle.

A Surprising Revelation: What Kids Actually Want

You might assume that a child who has been bullied wants maximum punishment for their tormentor. Surprisingly, data from the Singapore Children’s Society’s Tinklefriend helpline reveals otherwise.

Most children actually don’t want the other child punished. Because they still have to share a classroom, go to recess together, and participate in PE, they are usually looking for practical advice on:

• How to get along with the person.
• How to restore a fractured friendship.
• How to move past the incident safely.

The Rise of Restorative Justice

Because punishment alone doesn’t heal the hurt, schools are increasingly turning to Restorative Justice. This approach focuses on repairing the harm done rather than just penalizing the offender.

It involves facilitated, safe conversations where the child who was hurt can express their feelings, and the child who caused the hurt can understand the impact of their actions and commit to doing better. MOE is also revamping Character and Citizenship Education (CCE) lessons to include role-playing, which helps students build empathy and gives them the confidence to step in as active bystanders when they witness bullying, rather than just watching it happen.

How Parents Can Best Support Their Teens

If you discover your child is involved in a bullying incident (on either side), it is completely natural to feel highly emotional. However, the way we react can either de-escalate the situation or make it infinitely worse.

Here is what the experts recommend:

• Listen before you fix: Take a pause. Ask your child, “By telling me this, what would you like me to do for you?” Give them a voice and empower them to have a say in how the situation is handled.
• Don’t name and shame online: We’ve all seen the primary and secondary school parent WhatsApp groups blow up. Posting screenshots or demanding justice in a group chat usually spreads rumors, causes unnecessary drama, and deeply embarrasses your own child.
• Partner with the school: Teachers need time and space to investigate incidents fairly. Check in regularly with the school, but trust the process rather than going rogue and trying to confront other parents or students directly.
• Keep the door open: Don’t wait for a crisis to talk about bullying. Build a foundation of trust so your teen knows they can come to you with their struggles, and promise to respect their boundaries if they ask you not to immediately escalate an issue to their teacher.

Bullying, especially with the rise of complex cyberbullying on Instagram and TikTok, is an incredibly tough issue to navigate. While standardized discipline like caning draws the biggest headlines, the real work lies in building empathy, teaching better social skills, and keeping the lines of communication with our kids wide open.

A Parent's Guide to Singapore's Evolving Digital Landscape

With headlines buzzing about global social media bans for minors, many Singaporean parents are asking: Is a total ban the answer for our secondary schoolers?

Recently, Josephine Teo, Minister for Digital Development and Information, shared a perspective in The Straits Times that shifts the conversation from "locking the gates" to "building better roads." For parents of teens in Singapore, this nuanced approach offers a more practical roadmap for managing digital lives.

WHY A TOTAL BAN MIGHT NOT BE THE "SILVER BULLET"
While a ban sends a clear message that social media can be risky, it doesn't necessarily teach our children how to navigate it. For secondary school students, the digital world is an integral part of their social fabric and learning. Minister Teo suggests that instead of just banning, we need to focus on scaffolding.

THE "TRAINING WHEELS" CONCEPT
For teens aged 13 to 18, the goal is "digital maturity." Think of it like learning to ride a bike:

- Differentiated Services: Platforms shouldn't be "all or nothing." Teens should have access to a version of social media with "training wheels"—features that protect them while they learn.
- Age-Appropriate Experiences: Just as we have movie ratings (PG13 vs NC16), the digital experience should be tailored to a teen's developmental stage.

WHAT'S CHANGING FOR YOUR TEEN?
Singapore is looking at holding platforms more accountable. Here is what parents can expect (and demand) moving forward:

1. Ending "Addictive by Design": Features like infinite scrolls and autoplay, which keep teens glued to screens late into the night, are under fire. New regulations aim to curb these "rabbit hole" designs.
2. Safety by Default: Stricter rules on who can message your child. Unsolicited messages from strangers should be blocked by default.
3. Platform Responsibility: Platforms that don't prioritize the safety of Singaporean youth may face exclusion. The message is clear: If you want to operate here, you must protect our children.

THE PARENT'S ROLE: TOOLS, NOT JUST RULES
The government’s stance emphasizes that platforms have an obligation to provide parents with better tools. We shouldn't have to be tech geniuses to keep our kids safe. We need:

- Clearer information on safety settings.
- Simplified ways to assess if a platform’s design is actually healthy for a 14-year-old.
- A framework to help us set family rules that align with our own household values.

FINAL THOUGHTS
The transition from primary to secondary school is a leap in independence. By focusing on a "child-safe digital environment" rather than just a "no-go zone," we can help our teens develop the resilience they need for the future.

As our teens navigate the often tricky waters of secondary school, concerns about peer pressure, bullying, and even vaping naturally keep us up at night. Recently, Education Minister Desmond Lee addressed Parliament to outline the Ministry of Education’s (MOE) updated, stricter framework for tackling student misconduct.

If you missed the news, here is a quick, essential breakdown of what these new rules mean for our kids and how schools are handling discipline today.

1. Firmer Boundaries for Bullying and Vaping

MOE has rolled out a notably stricter framework for student misconduct. Under these new guidelines, students who bully others will face serious consequences that mirror the penalties for vaping offences. This includes immediate suspension, lowered conduct grades, and for first-time offenders of serious misconduct, one to three days of detention.

The philosophy here is grounded in research: youths simply make better choices when they are given clear boundaries enforced by firm, meaningful consequences.

2. Caning: A Strictly Regulated “Last Resort”

The topic of caning often sparks intense debate among parents. Minister Lee directly addressed this, acknowledging that while poorly administered physical punishment (such as in unregulated home settings) can have negative outcomes, the school context is entirely different.

In schools, caning is strictly a last resort reserved only for egregious violations. Parents can be assured that there are heavy protocols in place:

• It must be approved by the Principal.
• It is only administered by authorised teachers.
• The student’s maturity and ability to learn from the mistake are always taken into account.

Most importantly, caning is never done in isolation. It is always part of a wider restorative package that includes follow-up counselling, well-being monitoring, and rehabilitation.

3. What About the Girls?

Because Singapore law (the Criminal Procedure Code) prohibits the caning of females, parents might wonder if discipline is applied fairly across the board. Minister Lee clarified that girls who bully are no less culpable. Schools use a tiered approach to ensure all students face consequences proportionate to their actions. For girls, this means facing strict alternative penalties, including detention, suspension, and conduct grade adjustments.

4. Better Support for Cyberbullying & Mental Health

Bullying today isn’t just physical; it lives in our kids’ smartphones. Recognising this, MOE is ramping up support for cyber safety. A major update for parents to note is the launch of the Online Safety Commission at the end of June. This will provide victims of online harms—like cyberbullying, doxxing, and intimate image abuse—with much faster, dedicated assistance.

Furthermore, schools are receiving additional needs-based funding to hire dedicated youth workers, pastoral care officers, and parent liaison officers. Not only will this ease the heavy workload of our teachers, but it also ensures that students—especially those with special educational needs or mental health conditions—have trained professionals looking out for hidden signs of distress.

The Takeaway for Parents

MOE’s updated approach strikes a careful balance between strict disciplinary boundaries and restorative emotional care.

What can we do at home? Keep the communication channels wide open. Have an honest chat with your teenager this weekend about the updated consequences of bullying and vaping. More importantly, remind them that whether they make a mistake or fall victim to someone else’s, both the school and your family are there to support them in making things right.

If you have a child in secondary school, the recent Ministry of Education (MOE) announcement likely caught your eye. By 2027, all schools will follow a standardized “tougher” framework for bullying, including tiered suspensions and, for boys, the use of the cane (Ministry of Education, 2026).

As parents, our first instinct is often relief. We want “clearer rules” and “consistency.” We want to know that if our child is targeted, the system has teeth.

Standardizing the punishment is easy. Standardizing what happens in a private Discord server or a “secret” WhatsApp group chat? That is where the real work begins.

The Problem with “Downstream” Solutions

In secondary school, bullying is rarely a simple playground shove. It’s the “daily rehearsals of cruelty”—the subtle exclusion from a study group or the viral meme made at a classmate’s expense.

We can standardize the cane, but we cannot standardize what our children witness at home or on their screens. Research suggests that while school-based discipline is a necessary deterrent, it fails if it isn’t matched by “upstream” work: what we model, tolerate, and reward in our own living rooms (Ttofi & Farrington, 2011). If we only manage the symptom (the act of bullying) without addressing the root (the culture of aggression), we are simply teaching our kids how to be more discreet.

Are We Raising Leaders or Bystanders?

This is perhaps the most concerning part for parents. When we tell our children that the only solution to a bully is to wait for an adult or a rule to step in, we might be inadvertently training the Bystander Effect.

The Bystander Effect—where individuals stay silent because they assume “the system” will handle it—starts young (Latané & Darley, 1970). In a world that prizes “leadership” and “resilience,” do we want our children to be experts at compliance, or do we want them to have the moral courage to speak up in real-time?

If the lesson is always “wait for the discipline master,” our children may never learn how to confront injustice or protect a peer when no adult is watching.

The “Deterrence” Trap

Singapore has always been a “fine” city, believing that severity equals behavior change. But severity is not the same as effectiveness. If punishment alone worked, our youth crime and drug statistics would not be trending upward (Nagin, 2013).

Moreover, our children are savvy. They see a world where power often looks like dominance. Some educators have even noted students arguing that if “bullies” can run countries with impunity, why should they care about a school suspension? When the system also dictates that only boys are subject to corporal punishment (Singapore Education Regulations, Reg. 88), it sends a confusing message to our teens about gender, power, and what “justice” actually looks like.

What We Can Do as Parents

We cannot “kick the can down the road” and hope the school’s discipline framework will raise our children for us. To move from managing bullying to solving it, we need to focus on:

• Parental Alignment: Are we seeing our child’s behavior clearly, or are we making excuses because they have good results?
• Upstream Skills: Teaching emotional regulation and “active bystander” skills before a conflict even starts.
• Digital Safety: Recognizing that unlike 20 years ago, there is no “safe” home environment once a child has a smartphone.

Standardizing punishment is a start, but it isn’t the finish line. We need to raise a generation that doesn’t just fear the cane, but understands why they’ll never need it.

References

• Latané, B., & Darley, J. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help? Appleton-Century-Crofts.
• Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2026, April 15). Standardised disciplinary framework for bullying and peer-to-peer aggression. 
• Nagin, D. S. (2013). Deterrence in the twenty-first century. Crime and Justice, 42(1), 199-263.
• Singapore Education (Schools) Regulations. Regulation 88: Corporal punishment for male pupils. 
• Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2011). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7(1), 27-56.

If you’ve ever spent a Saturday morning cheering on your child from the sidelines of a school field or sports hall, you know that the National School Games (NSG) is more than just a competition—it’s a rite of passage.

With over 66,000 student-athletes participating annually, the NSG remains Singapore’s largest youth sporting event.However, a recent deep dive by The Straits Times has sparked a conversation: Does the NSG need a refresh?

As parents of secondary school students, here’s a breakdown of the debate and what it means for your child’s sporting journey.

1. More Play, Less “One-and-Done”

One of the biggest recent shifts happened in 2023 with the introduction of a new classification and pool-and-league system for several team sports.

In the past, many teams were knocked out early in zonal competitions, ending their season after just a few games. The new format is designed to give students more matches against opponents of similar skill levels.

• Why it matters for your child: It moves the focus away from “winning at all costs” and toward gaining experience, resilience, and more time on the court or field.

2. The Fight for New Sports (Is your child’s CCA missing?)

Did you know the last time a new sport was added to the NSG roster was back in 2011 (fencing)? Meanwhile, the Olympics have embraced modern trends like sport climbing, skateboarding, and even “breaking.”

Currently, popular youth activities like sport climbing, ultimate frisbee, and cycling are still on the sidelines, waiting for official NSG inclusion.

• The Challenge: The Ministry of Education (MOE) has to balance student interest with resources, safety, and scheduling.
• The Parent Perspective: If your child is passionate about a “non-NSG” sport, they may miss out on the SSSC Colours Awards, which can be a valuable addition to their portfolio for higher education admissions.

3. The “Elite vs. Participation” Debate

There is an ongoing debate among sports administrators: Should the NSG be a “funnel” for elite national athletes, or a platform for character building?

• The Elite View: Some argue the NSG should focus on sports that lead to major international games (like the SEA Games or Olympics) to better utilize national resources.
• The Holistic View: Most parents and educators argue that the primary goal is character building. Whether it’s squash or tchoukball, the values of discipline, teamwork, and handling defeat are what truly matter in the long run.

4. Preventing Burnout and “Dominance”

One concern raised in the report is that certain schools dominate specific sports so heavily that it becomes “demoralizing” for others. This can lead to dwindling participation in sports like squash, where schools may stop investing if they feel they have no chance of winning.

• What to watch for: If your child feels discouraged by a “powerhouse” opponent, remind them that the NSG is about personal growth and “tears of joy” from perseverance—like the recent story of a sprinter who overcame ligament tears to finally win gold.

The Bottom Line for Parents

The NSG is at a crossroads. While it has served generations well, the call for a “refresh” is about making sure school sports stay relevant to what today’s teenagers actually enjoy.

Whether your child is a budding Olympian or just playing for the love of the game, the possible “refresh” of the NSG could mean more variety, fairer competition, and a better balance between academic stress and physical well-being.