The School Bell SG — Timely updates for students and parents

As our teens navigate the often tricky waters of secondary school, concerns about peer pressure, bullying, and even vaping naturally keep us up at night. Recently, Education Minister Desmond Lee addressed Parliament to outline the Ministry of Education’s (MOE) updated, stricter framework for tackling student misconduct.

If you missed the news, here is a quick, essential breakdown of what these new rules mean for our kids and how schools are handling discipline today.

1. Firmer Boundaries for Bullying and Vaping

MOE has rolled out a notably stricter framework for student misconduct. Under these new guidelines, students who bully others will face serious consequences that mirror the penalties for vaping offences. This includes immediate suspension, lowered conduct grades, and for first-time offenders of serious misconduct, one to three days of detention.

The philosophy here is grounded in research: youths simply make better choices when they are given clear boundaries enforced by firm, meaningful consequences.

2. Caning: A Strictly Regulated “Last Resort”

The topic of caning often sparks intense debate among parents. Minister Lee directly addressed this, acknowledging that while poorly administered physical punishment (such as in unregulated home settings) can have negative outcomes, the school context is entirely different.

In schools, caning is strictly a last resort reserved only for egregious violations. Parents can be assured that there are heavy protocols in place:

• It must be approved by the Principal.
• It is only administered by authorised teachers.
• The student’s maturity and ability to learn from the mistake are always taken into account.

Most importantly, caning is never done in isolation. It is always part of a wider restorative package that includes follow-up counselling, well-being monitoring, and rehabilitation.

3. What About the Girls?

Because Singapore law (the Criminal Procedure Code) prohibits the caning of females, parents might wonder if discipline is applied fairly across the board. Minister Lee clarified that girls who bully are no less culpable. Schools use a tiered approach to ensure all students face consequences proportionate to their actions. For girls, this means facing strict alternative penalties, including detention, suspension, and conduct grade adjustments.

4. Better Support for Cyberbullying & Mental Health

Bullying today isn’t just physical; it lives in our kids’ smartphones. Recognising this, MOE is ramping up support for cyber safety. A major update for parents to note is the launch of the Online Safety Commission at the end of June. This will provide victims of online harms—like cyberbullying, doxxing, and intimate image abuse—with much faster, dedicated assistance.

Furthermore, schools are receiving additional needs-based funding to hire dedicated youth workers, pastoral care officers, and parent liaison officers. Not only will this ease the heavy workload of our teachers, but it also ensures that students—especially those with special educational needs or mental health conditions—have trained professionals looking out for hidden signs of distress.

The Takeaway for Parents

MOE’s updated approach strikes a careful balance between strict disciplinary boundaries and restorative emotional care.

What can we do at home? Keep the communication channels wide open. Have an honest chat with your teenager this weekend about the updated consequences of bullying and vaping. More importantly, remind them that whether they make a mistake or fall victim to someone else’s, both the school and your family are there to support them in making things right.

If you have a child in secondary school, the recent Ministry of Education (MOE) announcement likely caught your eye. By 2027, all schools will follow a standardized “tougher” framework for bullying, including tiered suspensions and, for boys, the use of the cane (Ministry of Education, 2026).

As parents, our first instinct is often relief. We want “clearer rules” and “consistency.” We want to know that if our child is targeted, the system has teeth.

Standardizing the punishment is easy. Standardizing what happens in a private Discord server or a “secret” WhatsApp group chat? That is where the real work begins.

The Problem with “Downstream” Solutions

In secondary school, bullying is rarely a simple playground shove. It’s the “daily rehearsals of cruelty”—the subtle exclusion from a study group or the viral meme made at a classmate’s expense.

We can standardize the cane, but we cannot standardize what our children witness at home or on their screens. Research suggests that while school-based discipline is a necessary deterrent, it fails if it isn’t matched by “upstream” work: what we model, tolerate, and reward in our own living rooms (Ttofi & Farrington, 2011). If we only manage the symptom (the act of bullying) without addressing the root (the culture of aggression), we are simply teaching our kids how to be more discreet.

Are We Raising Leaders or Bystanders?

This is perhaps the most concerning part for parents. When we tell our children that the only solution to a bully is to wait for an adult or a rule to step in, we might be inadvertently training the Bystander Effect.

The Bystander Effect—where individuals stay silent because they assume “the system” will handle it—starts young (Latané & Darley, 1970). In a world that prizes “leadership” and “resilience,” do we want our children to be experts at compliance, or do we want them to have the moral courage to speak up in real-time?

If the lesson is always “wait for the discipline master,” our children may never learn how to confront injustice or protect a peer when no adult is watching.

The “Deterrence” Trap

Singapore has always been a “fine” city, believing that severity equals behavior change. But severity is not the same as effectiveness. If punishment alone worked, our youth crime and drug statistics would not be trending upward (Nagin, 2013).

Moreover, our children are savvy. They see a world where power often looks like dominance. Some educators have even noted students arguing that if “bullies” can run countries with impunity, why should they care about a school suspension? When the system also dictates that only boys are subject to corporal punishment (Singapore Education Regulations, Reg. 88), it sends a confusing message to our teens about gender, power, and what “justice” actually looks like.

What We Can Do as Parents

We cannot “kick the can down the road” and hope the school’s discipline framework will raise our children for us. To move from managing bullying to solving it, we need to focus on:

• Parental Alignment: Are we seeing our child’s behavior clearly, or are we making excuses because they have good results?
• Upstream Skills: Teaching emotional regulation and “active bystander” skills before a conflict even starts.
• Digital Safety: Recognizing that unlike 20 years ago, there is no “safe” home environment once a child has a smartphone.

Standardizing punishment is a start, but it isn’t the finish line. We need to raise a generation that doesn’t just fear the cane, but understands why they’ll never need it.

---

References

• Latané, B., & Darley, J. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help? Appleton-Century-Crofts.
• Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2026, April 15). Standardised disciplinary framework for bullying and peer-to-peer aggression. 
• Nagin, D. S. (2013). Deterrence in the twenty-first century. Crime and Justice, 42(1), 199-263.
• Singapore Education (Schools) Regulations. Regulation 88: Corporal punishment for male pupils. 
• Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2011). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7(1), 27-56.

---

If you’ve ever spent a Saturday morning cheering on your child from the sidelines of a school field or sports hall, you know that the National School Games (NSG) is more than just a competition—it’s a rite of passage.

With over 66,000 student-athletes participating annually, the NSG remains Singapore’s largest youth sporting event.However, a recent deep dive by The Straits Times has sparked a conversation: Does the NSG need a refresh?

As parents of secondary school students, here’s a breakdown of the debate and what it means for your child’s sporting journey.

---

1. More Play, Less “One-and-Done”

One of the biggest recent shifts happened in 2023 with the introduction of a new classification and pool-and-league system for several team sports.

In the past, many teams were knocked out early in zonal competitions, ending their season after just a few games. The new format is designed to give students more matches against opponents of similar skill levels.

• Why it matters for your child: It moves the focus away from “winning at all costs” and toward gaining experience, resilience, and more time on the court or field.

2. The Fight for New Sports (Is your child’s CCA missing?)

Did you know the last time a new sport was added to the NSG roster was back in 2011 (fencing)? Meanwhile, the Olympics have embraced modern trends like sport climbing, skateboarding, and even “breaking.”

Currently, popular youth activities like sport climbing, ultimate frisbee, and cycling are still on the sidelines, waiting for official NSG inclusion.

• The Challenge: The Ministry of Education (MOE) has to balance student interest with resources, safety, and scheduling.
• The Parent Perspective: If your child is passionate about a “non-NSG” sport, they may miss out on the SSSC Colours Awards, which can be a valuable addition to their portfolio for higher education admissions.

3. The “Elite vs. Participation” Debate

There is an ongoing debate among sports administrators: Should the NSG be a “funnel” for elite national athletes, or a platform for character building?

• The Elite View: Some argue the NSG should focus on sports that lead to major international games (like the SEA Games or Olympics) to better utilize national resources.
• The Holistic View: Most parents and educators argue that the primary goal is character building. Whether it’s squash or tchoukball, the values of discipline, teamwork, and handling defeat are what truly matter in the long run.

4. Preventing Burnout and “Dominance”

One concern raised in the report is that certain schools dominate specific sports so heavily that it becomes “demoralizing” for others. This can lead to dwindling participation in sports like squash, where schools may stop investing if they feel they have no chance of winning.

• What to watch for: If your child feels discouraged by a “powerhouse” opponent, remind them that the NSG is about personal growth and “tears of joy” from perseverance—like the recent story of a sprinter who overcame ligament tears to finally win gold.

---

The Bottom Line for Parents

The NSG is at a crossroads. While it has served generations well, the call for a “refresh” is about making sure school sports stay relevant to what today’s teenagers actually enjoy.

Whether your child is a budding Olympian or just playing for the love of the game, the possible “refresh” of the NSG could mean more variety, fairer competition, and a better balance between academic stress and physical well-being.

As parents, our children’s safety and well-being at school are always top of mind. Recently, the Ministry of Education (MOE) announced a significant update to how schools handle misconduct, specifically targeting school bullying. With bullying cases in secondary schools rising from 6 to 8 cases per 1,000 students in recent years, these changes are designed to provide a firmer, more consistent response across Singapore.

Here is a breakdown of what these new guidelines mean for your teen and how the landscape of school discipline is shifting.

1. Stricter Penalties: Aligning Bullying with Vaping

In a move to show zero tolerance, MOE is now aligning the punishments for school bullies with those caught vaping. The goal is clear: serious misconduct will have serious consequences.

Under the new framework, even first-time offenders of serious misconduct (like physical assault or repeated social bullying) can face:

• 1 to 3 days of detention or suspension.
• A conduct grade adjustment.
• Caning (for older boys): One stroke of the cane may be administered if there are aggravating factors.

For “very serious” or repeat offences, the penalties scale up significantly, with suspensions lasting up to 14 days, a “Poor” conduct grade, and up to three strokes of the cane for older boys.

2. Understanding the Difference: “Hurtful Behaviour” vs. “Bullying”

MOE has clarified the definitions to help schools and parents distinguish between different types of incidents:

• Hurtful Behaviours: These are often one-off incidents, such as an insensitive remark or a single physical altercation.
• Bullying: This refers to repeated and intentional acts of harm.

Schools will weigh factors like the perpetrator’s intent, whether the act was repeated, and the overall impact on the victim before deciding on the level of punishment.

3. A Holistic Approach: It’s Not Just About Punishment

While the headlines focus on caning and suspensions, the MOE emphasizes that discipline remains rehabilitative.

• Counselling and Support: Schools will continue to provide counselling to address the root causes of a student’s behavior.
• Restorative Practice: This involves helping the student understand the harm they’ve caused and finding ways to make amends.
• Mental Well-being: Before any major punishment like caning is administered, schools must consider mitigating factors such as the student’s age, maturity, and mental health needs.

4. Better Support for Cyber-bullying

If your teen is facing harassment online—such as doxxing or the sharing of intimate images—the support now extends beyond the school gates. The new Online Safety Commission (launching at the end of June) will have the power to order social media platforms to remove harmful content within 24 hours if the platform fails to act.

5. What Should Parents Do?

The MOE has committed to keeping parents informed at “key stages” of any investigation or disciplinary process. Here is how you can support your child:

• Open Dialogue: Talk to your teen about the new rules. Emphasize that “jokes” can quickly cross the line into bullying.
• Report Early: If your child is being bullied, encourage them to use the school’s reporting channels. MOE is increasing funding and manpower to ensure these reports are handled more efficiently.
• Monitor Conduct Grades: Remind your teen that conduct grades (Fair, Poor, etc.) are issued every semester and can impact future school and program applications.

These changes, which will be fully implemented across all schools by 2027, represent a tougher stance on school culture. By staying informed, we can help our children navigate their secondary school years safely and respectfully.

If you’ve been following the news recently, you might have heard discussions about Singapore’s “steeper slope” in educational performance. In a recent parliamentary session, Jasmin Lau from the Ministry of Education (MOE) clarified what this actually means for our children—and it’s more encouraging than the headlines suggest.

For parents of secondary school students, understanding this “slope” is key to navigating the resources available to help your child thrive, regardless of your family’s starting point.

---

The “Steeper Slope” Explained: High Floor, Higher Ceiling

In global rankings (PISA), Singapore shows a strong link between socio-economic status (SES) and academic results. However, Lau highlighted a crucial distinction:

• The High Floor: Our students from lower-income households actually perform better than their international peers in the same income bracket.
• The High Ceiling: The “slope” is steep because our high-performing students excel by an even larger margin.

MOE’s stance is clear: They will not “cap” the potential of high achievers to make the statistics look more equal. Instead, the focus is on “lifting the floor”—ensuring every student, especially those in secondary school where the academic pressure ramps up, has the resources to climb as high as they can.

---

Key Resources for Secondary School Families

If you are concerned about balancing the costs of a holistic secondary education, here are the primary avenues of support available to you in 2026:

1. MOE Financial Assistance Scheme (FAS)

The FAS is designed to ensure that no student is denied a secondary education due to financial hardship.

• Full Waiver: 100% waiver of school and miscellaneous fees.
• Daily Essentials: Free textbooks, uniforms, and a transport subsidy (up to $21/month for public transport).
• Meal Subsidies: Secondary students receive subsidies for 10 meals per week at the school canteen.
• School Bus Subsidy: For those with special needs or specific circumstances, coverage of up to 75% of school bus fees.

2. The UPLIFT Initiative & After-School Support

For secondary students, the “after-school” environment is where the gap often widens. The UPLIFT (Uplifting Pupils in Life and Inspiring Families Together) program provides:

• School-Based Engagement: Many secondary schools now have dedicated spaces (often called “The Den” or “Gear-Up” rooms) where students can stay after school for supervised study, mentorship, and interest-based activities.
• UPLIFT Scholarship: A $1,200 annual award for students from lower-income families who have demonstrated resilience and entered Independent Schools via the Direct School Admission (DSA) or performed well academically.

3. Opportunity Fund (OF)

Every secondary school has an Opportunity Fund to help subsidized students pay for “extra” but essential experiences. This includes:

• Co-Curricular Activities (CCA): Buying sports gear, musical instruments, or uniforms.
• Enrichment: Subsidizing the cost of school trips or specialized workshops.
• Digital Access: Helping students own a personal learning device (PLD) through the NEU PC Plus or enhanced Edusave top-ups.

---

A Shift in Philosophy: Full Subject-Based Banding (Full SBB)

One of the most significant ways MOE is addressing the SES gap in secondary schools is through Full SBB.

By removing the “Express,” “Normal Academic,” and “Normal Technical” labels, students can now take subjects at a level (G1, G2, or G3) that matches their strengths. This prevents “tracking” from limiting a child’s future based on their PSLE score alone.

The Goal: To ensure that by the time your child reaches the O-Levels or N-Levels, their results are a reflection of their hard work and talent, not their family’s bank account.

---

How to Access Help

If you feel your child could benefit from these programs:

1. Check Eligibility: Use the MOE FAS online calculator to see if your household meets the income criteria.
2. Talk to the School: Every secondary school has a Year Head or School Social Worker who can provide discreet assistance for families facing temporary financial or home-life challenges.
3. Parents Gateway: Keep an eye on the app for announcements regarding bursaries and community-led tuition programs.

Singapore’s education system is moving toward a future where every student has a “ladder” that matches their ambition. Does your child feel they have the right support at their current school, or are there areas where you’d like to see more resources?

The recent conversation between leadership consultant Crystal Lim-Lange and the Ya Lah But team touched on some raw nerves for Singaporean parents. As the Ministry of Education (MOE) moves toward a new model for the Gifted Education Programme (GEP), many of us are wondering: What does success actually look like for our kids in 2026?

If your child is navigating the secondary school “pressure cooker,” here are four critical takeaways from the transcript that might change how you view their report card—and their future.

---

1. Grades Measure “Obedience,” Not Just Intelligence

One of Crystal’s most striking points is the distinction between grades and IQ. While we often conflate the two, she argues:

• Grades are largely a measure of discipline and obedience.
• IQ/Giftedness is often a form of neurodivergence.

For parents of “difficult” or highly restless students, this is a breath of fresh air. If your child is struggling to sit still or constantly questioning the teacher, they aren’t necessarily “bad” students; they might simply be neuro-atypical kids who don’t fit the “mold.” Instead of forcing them into a specific shape, we should be looking for ways to ignite their specific spark.

2. The Move Toward “Meta-Skills”

We’ve all joked about the “Oxbow Lake”—that piece of geography knowledge we memorized for exams but never used again. Crystal suggests that in the age of AI, subject-specific knowledge is becoming secondary to Meta-Skills.

Instead of just chasing “A”s in content-heavy subjects, focus on whether your teen is developing:

• Critical Thinking: Can they tell the difference between correlation and causation?
• Negotiation & Conflict Management: Can they handle a disagreement without a “meltdown”?
• Social-Emotional Intelligence (EQ): Do they have the “social lubrication” to work in diverse teams?

3. The “Cognitive Brink” and the End of Fear-Based Motivation

For decades, the “scarcity mindset”—the fear that “if you don’t study, you’ll fall behind”—worked for Singapore. But the transcript issues a stern warning: today’s generation is at their limit.

With the constant “weapons of mass distraction” (TikTok, Instagram) and the performative nature of social media, our kids are facing doubledigit spikes in anxiety and self-harm.

The Takeaway: Motivating through fear and “not enough-ness” might have worked for us, but it is pushing today’s teens over the edge. We need to shift from fear to empathy and psychological safety.

4. Modeling “Psychological Safety” at Home

How often do we admit our failures to our children? Crystal points out that if we want our kids to have a Growth Mindset, they need to see it in action.

“Psychological safety” isn’t just a corporate buzzword; it’s a parenting tool. It means creating a home environment where:

• It is safe to take a risk (like trying a new CCA or elective) and fail.
• It is safe to challenge an opinion (even yours) without being shut down.
• Vulnerability is rewarded, not punished.

If we want our children to be leaders who can “walk the talk,” they need to see us apologizing properly and admitting when we don’t have all the answers.

---

Final Thought: Success as a “Portfolio”

Rather than seeing life as a single ladder propped against one wall (the “Degree-to-Job” ladder), we should encourage our kids to view their lives as a portfolio. Their career is just one slice of the pizza; their character, their ability to lead with empathy, and their mental resilience are what will actually keep them afloat in a world dominated by AI.

Parenting check-in: When was the last time you praised your child for their effort or their bravery in asking a tough question, rather than just the number on their exam paper?

Which of these “meta-skills”—critical thinking, EQ, or resilience—do you feel is currently the biggest gap in your child’s school curriculum?

Whether your child just survived the PSLE or is already deep into the trenches of the O-Levels or IP track, one thing remains constant in the Singapore education system: the workload only gets heavier.

We’ve all seen it—the “study harder” approach starts to fail when the subjects move from simple recall to complex application. If your teen is spending hours at their desk but the results aren’t reflecting the effort, the missing link might not be hard work, but metacognition.

In a recent PSLE Companion podcast, experts Mark Pung (PSLE Ninja) and Sandra Davie (The Straits Times) broke down how “thinking about thinking” can revolutionize revision. Here is how you can adapt those neuroscience-backed strategies for the secondary school years.

---

What is Metacognition (and Why Should You Care?)

Metacognition is essentially a student’s ability to step outside their own head and observe their learning process. It’s the difference between a student who blindly memorizes a ten-page history chapter and one who asks, “Do I actually understand the cause-and-effect here, or am I just familiar with the words?”

In secondary school, where “Higher Order Thinking Skills” (HOTS) are the name of the game, metacognition is the “reliability” check for every revision session.

---

The Three “Revision Personas” in Teens

When you sit down to help your teen (if they still let you!), you’ll likely notice they fall into one of three categories identified by Pung. Recognizing these helps you tailor your support:

1. The “Memory Dumper” (The Storyteller): This student knows the facts but struggles to filter them. Ask them a Biology question about osmosis, and they’ll give you the entire chapter’s history. They need help narrowing down why specific information applies to the question at hand.
2. The “Careless Mistake King” (The Overconfident): They rush. They see a Math problem and jump straight to the answer, often missing a “units” requirement or a subtle keyword. They need to slow down and verbalize their logic to catch their own errors.
3. The “Blank Page” (The ‘I Don’t Know’ Child): This is the most common persona in secondary school as questions get tougher. Often, they do know the answer but are so afraid of being wrong that they shut down. The goal here is to create a “safe space” where they are encouraged to commit to an answer—even a wrong one—just to get the gears turning.

---

The “Think-Aloud” Strategy: From Supervisor to Coach

In primary school, we often act as supervisors (checking if the homework is done). In secondary school, we need to transition into coaches.

The best way to do this is the “Think-Aloud” method. Instead of asking for the right answer, ask your teen to verbalize their thought process as they work through a TYS (Topical Yearly Series) question.

Try asking these “Metacognitive Prompts” instead of correcting them:

• “What made you choose this specific formula for this Physics problem?”
• “How did you decide that this was the main argument in this Social Studies source?”
• “If this method didn’t work, what would your ‘Plan B’ be?”

---

The End Goal: Retiring the “Helicopter”

The most refreshing takeaway from the podcast? Nurturing metacognition is the fastest way to end “helicopter parenting.”

When a student understands how they learn, they become self-correcting. They start to realize when they are drifting off, when they don’t truly understand a concept, and when they need to seek help. This doesn’t just help with the O-Levels; it’s a life skill that carries them through JC, Poly, and into the workforce.

The Bottom Line

The next time your teen is stuck on a difficult practice paper, don’t rush to give them the answer key. Praise the effort of the “try,” ask a “How” or “Why” question, and let them talk their way through the logic. You aren’t just helping them pass an exam—you’re teaching them how to master their own mind.

If you’re a parent of a secondary schooler in Singapore, you’ve likely felt the shift in the air over the last few years. The Ministry of Education (MOE) has been busy: mid-year exams are gone, the PSLE scoring system has changed, and there’s a massive push toward “Subject-Based Banding.”

The goal? To end the “education arms race” and bring the joy of learning back to our kids.

But if the goal is to lower stress, why does it feel like the treadmill is just moving faster? Why are we still staying up late worrying about DSA applications or whether our child needs one more niche enrichment class?

A recent commentary by researchers from the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS) sheds some light on this, and it’s a perspective every parent needs to hear.

1. It’s Not Just “Kiasu-ism”—It’s “Insurance”

We often label ourselves or others as “kiasu parents” with a bit of a laugh and a sigh. But the researchers argue that our behavior isn’t actually about being competitive or status-conscious.

Instead, we treat education like insurance.

In a system that has traditionally felt “high stakes,” we use tuition, brand-name schools, and CCAs as a hedge against future risk. We want to protect our children from “irreversible loss”—the fear that one wrong move at age 12 or 16 will close doors forever. When we chase a “top” school, we aren’t just chasing a badge; we’re chasing the perceived security of better networks and more resources.

2. The Identity Trap: Being “Singaporean”

A recent IPS-CNA study found something fascinating: when asked what traits define a Singaporean, the top answers weren’t “Singlish” or “food.” They were “valuing education” and “being kiasu.”

This means that for many of us, the “arms race” is baked into our identity. It’s how we define a “responsible parent.” If the system removes exams, our “responsible parent” script simply tells us to find a new way to give our child an edge—whether that’s moving house to be near a specific school or doubling down on specialized coaching.

3. Why “Every School is a Good School” is a Hard Sell

The commentary acknowledges a hard truth: as long as there are visible differences in the “attractiveness” of schools (in terms of autonomy, special programs, or alumni networks), parents will continue to compete for them.

It’s a rational response. If we believe certain schools offer a “smoother” path, we will naturally try to get our kids onto that path. To truly lower the temperature, the researchers argue we need to:

• Lower the cost of being “wrong” early: We need to know—and see—that there are credible second chances and that “early sorting” doesn’t define a life.
• Narrow the gap: It’s not enough to hide school rankings; we need to ensure that the opportunities (like high-end enrichment and CCAs) are balanced across all schools.

4. Rewriting the Script

The most important takeaway for us as parents is how we define our role. The authors suggest we need to move away from a “responsible parent” script that is about gaming the system for a narrow advantage.

Instead, the focus should shift to:

• Building steady foundations: Focusing on core learning rather than “niche” coaching.
• Faith in lifelong learning: Trusting that the journey is long and that our kids can thrive even if they don’t take the “express” route every single time.
• Leveraging technology: Using tools like AI to provide high-quality support at home, reducing the need for expensive, high-pressure tuition.

The Bottom Line

We don’t have to stop valuing education—it’s part of who we are. But we can choose to redirect that energy.

The next time you feel the urge to join the “arms race,” ask yourself: Am I buying insurance out of fear, or am I building a foundation out of love?

What do you think? Has the removal of mid-year exams lowered your stress, or has the competition just moved elsewhere?

As parents of secondary school students, we’ve all been there: the late-night struggle over a complex calculus problem or a physics equation that seems written in a different language. In the past, the immediate solution was often to look for a math tuition center.

But as we move into 2026, a new player has entered the room: Generative AI.

A recent interview in The Straits Times with Raghav Gupta, OpenAI’s Head of Education for Asia-Pacific, sheds light on a debate every parent should hear. Is AI making our kids “lazy,” or is it the most powerful tutor we’ve ever seen?

If you are currently weighing whether to invest in traditional math tuition or let your child lean on digital tools, here is what you need to know.

1. The “Calculator” Trap

Gupta makes a brilliant comparison: AI is the new calculator. If you give a primary schooler a calculator before they understand multiplication, they never actually learn to think mathematically. The same risk applies to secondary students using ChatGPT to solve their math homework. If they just copy-paste the answer, they lose the “friction” required for learning.

The takeaway for parents: If your child uses AI to get the answer, they aren’t learning. If they use it to understand the method, they are.

2. From “Give me the answer” to “Explain the logic”

OpenAI is actively fighting the “shortcut” culture. They’ve introduced “Study Mode,” a feature specifically designed to act like a Socratic tutor. Instead of handing over the solution, the AI asks guiding questions, helping your child find the answer themselves.

For math students, they have also launched dynamic visual explanations. Imagine your child struggling with the Pythagoras Theorem. Instead of a static textbook page, the AI generates an interactive visual that they can manipulate to see how the angles and sides change in real-time.

3. Should You Still Sign Up for Tuition?

Traditional tuition provides accountability and human mentorship—things AI cannot fully replace. However, the role of a tutor is changing. Gupta notes that even at top institutions like NUS, the focus is shifting toward critical thinking and judgment.

When considering a tuition center, ask them:

• Do you incorporate AI tools to help students visualize concepts?
• Do you teach students how to verify AI-generated answers?
• Is the focus on “grilling” (repetitive practice) or on “judgment” (knowing which method to apply)?

4. Preparing for a Different Workforce

By the time your secondary schooler enters the workforce, “knowing the formula” won’t be enough—the AI will know all the formulas. Success will depend on AI literacy.

Gupta highlights that Singaporean students are currently ahead of the curve thanks to the national EdTech Masterplan. By allowing your child to use AI responsibly now—as a tutor that guides them through “friction-filled” learning—you are preparing them for a future where AI is a standard workplace partner.

The Bottom Line

AI isn’t the enemy of the O-Levels or IP exams; it’s a tool that can “supercharge” learning if used correctly.

Whether you choose a private tutor or a digital-first approach, the goal remains the same: Don’t remove the struggle.The “friction” of solving a hard math problem is exactly where the learning happens. Ensure your child is using AI to light the path, not to skip the walk.

If you’ve walked past your teenager’s room lately, you’ve probably seen the glow of a tablet and wondered: Are they actually doing their geography essay, or is ChatGPT doing it for them?

It’s the million-dollar question for every Singaporean parent right now. Luckily, a recent episode of the Deep Dive podcast featuring Dr. Janil Puthucheary (Senior Minister of State for Education) shed some much-needed light on how our schools are handling the “AI invasion.”

As a parent of a secondary schooler, here is the “TL;DR” on what the Ministry of Education (MOE) is thinking—and why you might be able to breathe a little easier.

---

1. The “Staged” Approach: Secondary School is the “Sweet Spot”

Dr. Janil explained that MOE isn’t just dumping AI into classrooms. There’s a strategy:

• Primary School: It’s all about the “human” basics—socializing, playing, and learning that $2 + 2 = 4$ without a calculator.
• Secondary School: This is where the training wheels start to come off. With Personal Learning Devices (PLDs)in hand, your teen is moving from learning about AI to learning with AI.

The goal? To turn them into self-directed learners. Think of AI as a high-tech lab assistant—it can help gather data, but your child still has to be the scientist who draws the conclusion.

2. The “Exam” Guardrail (No, they can’t use ChatGPT for the O-Levels)

One of the biggest fears is that kids will “outsource” their brains. Dr. Janil was very clear: AI remains banned in the exam hall. Why? Because students still need to prove they have internalized the skills. If a student uses AI for every project but can’t solve a problem under exam conditions, they hit a wall. As parents, we need to remind our teens that while AI can “vibe-code” or draft a paragraph, intellectual integrity means being able to stand on your own two feet when the Wi-Fi is off.

3. Beware the “Hallucination”

We’ve all seen AI confidently state a “fact” that is completely wrong. Dr. Janil highlighted that teaching kids to spot these “hallucinations” is a core part of the new curriculum.

Parent Tip: Next time your child uses AI for research, ask them: “How do you know that’s true? Did you check the source?” Teaching them to be a “Human-in-the-Loop” is the best way to future-proof their careers.

4. Teachers Aren’t Being Replaced—They’re Being “Upgraded”

If you’re worried teachers are getting lost in the tech, don’t be. Dr. Janil noted that AI is actually being used to reduce teacher workload (like administrative marking).

• The benefit for your child: Less time spent on paperwork means your child’s teacher has more time for mentorship and relationship-building. AI can mark a math paper, but it can’t tell when a student is feeling discouraged or needs a different explanation to “click.”

5. Beyond Grades: The SkillsFuture Connection

The talk touched on the merger of Workforce Singapore (WSG) and SkillsFuture. For secondary parents, the takeaway is simple: the “job for life” is gone.

Whether your child becomes a florist or a data analyst, they will need to “upskill” every few years. The “Education Reset” is teaching them how to learn how to learn.

---

The Bottom Line

Dr. Janil’s message was one of cautious optimism: “Don’t be afraid.” Our kids are digital nomads. They will adapt faster than we will. Our job isn’t to ban the tech, but to ensure they don’t use it to “skip” the thinking process.

As Dr. Janil quipped, AI is being sent to art school so it can learn to draw its own conclusions—but it still doesn’t have a human “opinion.” That’s where our kids will always have the edge.